Customary Succession in Punjab
Customary Succession in Punjab legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Legislative history reviewed.
"Customary Succession in Punjab", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21126
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Customary Succession in Punjab"
2012 Y L R 97
GHULAM RASUL and 9 others — Petitioners Versus SHER MUHAMMAD through Representative and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1969 S C M R 296
Mst. SATTO‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SUGHRAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High Court1987 S C M R 1029
ABDUL KHALIQ through Legal Heirs‑‑Appellant Versus BASHIR AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑S.6 (a)‑‑Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (IX of 1962), Preamble‑‑West Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (IX of1948), S. 3‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3)‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider contentions (i) that as the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 did not apply to Province of Punjab, the transfer or surrender of reversionary rights were valid under custom; (ii) that if the provisions of Act V of 1962 are read alongwith those of Act, 1948, the position that emerges was that a limited estate, held, by Muslim female under custom having been terminated, widow and two daughters of deceased owner became vested with the ownership of property according to the share under Shariat Law and therefore, the relinquishment of their interests in favour of the appellant was valid.‑‑ Custom(Punjab).1886 M L D 437
TALIB KHAN and 6 others‑‑Petitioners Versus COLLECTOR, LYALLPUR and others‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1983 Supreme Court 273
THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, LAW & PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD. -Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD.ISHAQUE AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: Shariat Beach1983 S C M R 80
Mst. BEGAN-Appellant/Defendant Versus Mst. BAI-Respondent/Plaintiff
Court: ----S. 30-A(1) read with West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (V of 196?), S. 3-Estate held by females under S. 30-A(l)-Really a limited estate held under custom-Provisions of S. 3 of Act V of 1962 attracted to case-Limited estate having been terminated by Act V of 1962, widow entitled to hold only her share as determined under Muhammadan Law.-Muhammadan Law-Custom.1996 C L C 562
'SAMUAL and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PIARA MASIH and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1993 C L C 2058
Mst. GHULAM SIDDIQA and other‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. NOOR BEGUM through Legal Heirs‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP
Mst. BHAKHAN‑Petitioner Versus MANAK‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1960 (W
AHMAD DIN AND OTHERS‑ — Plaintiffs — Appellants Versus FATEH MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (a) Custom (Punjab)‑----Succession‑Ancestral property‑(A rains of Salamatpura near Lahore)‑Appointment of heir‑Appointee dying issueless‑Widow succeeding on life estate‑Succession on death of widow‑(i) Property reverts to daughter of last male holder (i.e. appointer) ; in absence of daughter, to her sons, but not to collaterals of last male holder (per Shabir Ahmad, J.)‑(ii) Property reverts neither to collaterals nor to daughter or daughter's heirs, but goes to "personal heirs" of appointee‑heir (per Kaikaus, J.)‑Reversionary interest‑Explained‑Rattigan's Digest of Customary Law, para. SS; A I R 1934 Lah. 725 ref..