Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate Jurisdiction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.
"Appellate Jurisdiction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21162
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appellate Jurisdiction"
P L D 2026 Supreme Court 291
Messrs MOON DENTAL CLINIC, ISLAMABAD and another — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD-WEST and another — Respondents
Court: ----Arts.175-F(1)(c) inserted through Constitution (Twenty-seventh Amendment) Act (XXXII of 2025) & 185(3)---Civil petition for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court---Maintainability Post---Twenty-seventh Constitutional amendment---Office objection---Matter relating to rent proceedings---No appeal lay before Supreme Court in rent matters, objection of---Legality---Rent matter not being expressly excluded from appellate jurisdiction of Federal Constitutional Court---Effect---Overruling of objection---Scope---Briefly, present petition for leave to appeal was filed against the High Court judgment passed under Article 199 of the Constitution in a rent matter, where the office objected that after Article 175F (27th Amendment), the High Court was the final forum and no appeal lay to the Supreme Court---Held: The proviso to Article 185(3), which provided that "no appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court in cases to which clause (1) of Article 175F applies", made it evident that the bar on the appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court was confined only to those cases which, in fact, fell within the ambit of Article 175F(1)---Since rent and family matters stood expressly excluded from the applicability of Article 175F(1)(c), such cases could not be regarded as cases to which Article 175F applied---Consequently, petitions arising out of rent and family matters were not barred from the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 185(3), subject to the grant of leave---The objection raised by the Office, premised on the petition arising out of a rent matter, was misconceived and was rightly overruled---In view of the express exclusion of rent matters from the scope of Article 175F(1)(c), such cases could not be regarded as falling within Article 175F(1)---The proviso to Article 185(3) was, therefore, not attracted, and the present petition was maintainable, in circumstances.1992CLC453
HUSSAIN CORPORATION‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, D.G. KHAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2002 P L C (C
ASHFAQ AHMED Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary and 3 others
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)P L D 1967 Lahore 439
GHULAM HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER-Appellants Versus GHULAM MUSTAFA AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court:P L D 1975 Supreme Court 32
SINDH EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION AND ANOTHER Appellants Versus ADAMJEE COTTON MILLS LTD. Respondent
Court:1999 C L C 1121
MUHAMMAD ASAR HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Decree‑holder Versus KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
Court: KarachiP L D 2021 Supreme Court 809
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP
MUHAMMAD SHAFI and others‑Appellants Versus DIN MUHAMMAD and others‑Respondents
Court:2003 P T D 1774
DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX (REFUND), LAHORE Versus AYESHA TEXTILE MILLS Ltd.
Court: Lahore High Court2006 P T D 310
TOWELLERS LTD. through Chief Operating Officer Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN Represented by Member Sales Tax
Court: Karachi High Court