Home Maxims & Terms Business Expenditure meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Business Expenditure

Business Expenditure legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 PTD 1136 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 23(1)(xviii), 24(a) & 136(1)Finance Act (XII of 1991), S. 12Business expenditureCorporate assets tax

Authorities were aggrieved of order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal directing for allowance for corporate assets tax as expenses allowable under S.23 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979

Validity

Any expenditure incurred for the purposes of business which was neither capital nor personal was an allowable expenditure under S. 23(1)(xviii) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979

Only bar which could be imposed was whether such expenditure was incurred in ordinary course of business or not and on the ground of commercial expediency and had a direct nexus and relation with the business or not

While making assessment of a company corporate assets tax had to be given the same treatment as that of wealth tax since it was a direct levy on the assets held by a company

Such was an allowable expenditure and the same was rightly allowed by appellate authority as well as Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Provisions of S. 24(a) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, were not applicable as corporate assets tax was not a tax on the profits and the gains of a company rather it was a direct charge or levy upon the assets held by a company as specified in S. 12 of Finance Act, 1991

High Court answered the question in affirmative against the authorities and in favour of assessee

Reference was dismissed in circumstances.

2002 PTD 1152 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureDisallowanceLimits on certain expenditure on employees towards benefit or perquisitesDisallowance of excessExtent of disallowanceProvisions of statute to be appliedRule relating to computation of such benefits perquisite to assess it in hands of employee not relevantIndian Income Tax Ordinance, 1961, &40A(5)Indian Income Tax Rules, 1962, R.3

[CIT v. Britannia Industries Co. Ltd. (1982) 135 ITR 35 (Cal.) and Geoffrey Manners & Co. Ltd. v. CIT. (1996) 221 ITR 695 (Bom.) overruled].

2002 PTD 1733 PUNJAB-AND-HARYANA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
ReferenceBusiness expenditureCommissionTribunal considering evidence and holding that payment had been made and that it was for business purposesTribunal was justified in allowing deduction of commissionNo question of law arose

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 37 & 256.

2002 PTD 1708 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureCeiling on expenditureCommission paid to Managing DirectorHas also to be taken into account in considering limit of expenditure allowable under S.40(c)

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 40(c).

2002 PTD 1677 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureClaim that articles had been distributed to customers as sales incentiveFinding that there had been an indirect distribution of profits among members of assessee-associationExpenditure on articles was not deductible

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.

2002 PTD 1438 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureCompanyDisallowance of expenditure above prescribed ceilingExpenditure resulting in benefit or amenity to director or person substantially interested in companyMedical reimbursement must be taken into account in calculating ceiling

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40(c).

2002 PTD 1421 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureLand taken by assessee from GovernmentEstimated interest on cost of landContingent liabilityNot deductible

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.

2002 PTD 1403 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureOther sourcesDeductions from income from other sourcesDisallowance of interest under Ss.40A(8) & 58(2)Disallowance not applicable to miscellaneous finance companyDecision by CIT in relation to assessment years 1983-84 and 1984-85 that assessee was a miscellaneous financial companyAssessee was entitled to deduction of interest in assessment years in question

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.40A & 58.

2002 PTD 1351 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureDisallowance of expenditure above prescribed limitTraveling expensed of employee or any other person Meaning of any other person in R. 62(2)Any other person would include a director or Managing DirectorTraveling expenses of Director or Managing Director above prescribed limit can be disallowed

Indian Income Tax Rules, 1962, R.6D.

2002 PTD 1319 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureDisallowance of expenditureexpenditure on advertisementLaw applicableSubsection (3A) of S.37 inserted w.e.f, 1-4-1979Subsection (3A) applicable for assessment year 1979-80

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.

2002 PTD 1295 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureCeiling on expenditureExemptionDirector of company a foreign technician entitled to- exemption under S.10(6)(viia)

Amount exempt under S.10(6)(viia) is not to be taken into account for fixing coiling under S.40(c) read with S.40A(5)(b)

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss .10(6)(viia), 40(c) 8c 40A(5)(b),

2002 PTD 1267 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureGratuityConditions laid down in S.40A(7) must be fulfilled in order to claim deduction

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A.

2002 PTD 1070 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureCapital or revenue expenditureInterest on borrowed capitalAssessee borrowing money for purpose of setting up a printing facsimile unitInterest paid allowable as revenue expenditure

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.

2002 PTD 848 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureBanking companyInterest on securitiesRectification of mistakePurchase and sale of securities in course of business of bankingSecurities held as stock-in-tradeInterest paid for broken period on purchase of securitiesDeductible as business expenditureRectification to disallow deductionNot justifiedIndian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 19, 20, X1(1) & 154

CBDT Circular No.599, dated 24-4-1991.

2002 PTD 1415 KERALA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureDisallowance of expenditurePayment towards provident fundEffect- of proviso to S.43BPayments made after "due date" are not deductible

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.36(l)(va), Expln. & 43B.

2002 PTD 1653 GUJARAT-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureBetterment chargesNot deductible

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.

2002 PTD 1710 DELHI-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureDisallowanceEntertainment expenditureLaw applicableExpenditure incurred in India for stay of foreign customers in hotelNot lavish or entertainment expensesHospitality necessary and expedient for business purposesEligible for deduction as business expenditure for assessment year 1975-76

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.

2002 PTD 1310 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureDisallowance of expenditureAmounts paid in cash in excess of specified limitAmount paid in cash for disbursement among Lorry driversPayments reflected in account booksAmounts could not be disallowedIndian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A(3)

Indian Income Tax Rules, 1962, R.6DD,

2002 PTD 1260 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureAccountingLiability in respect of additional fuel surcharge for power consumptionAssessee following mercantile system of accountingAgreement between assesssee and Electricity Board that fuel surcharge would form part of monthly billDeduction allowable for fuel surcharge in year of consumption of electricity and not in year of quantificationAssessee consuming electricity in previous year relating to assessment year 1981-82Additional fuel surcharge allowable in assessment year 1981-82

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.

2002 PTD 1690 ANDHRA-PRADESH-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business expenditureDisallowanceExpenditure on advertisement or sales promotionGovernment company incorporated for promoting industrial developmentExpenditure incurred on brochure, etc. was not on advertisement of sales promotionNo disallowance under S.37(3-A) can be made

Indian Income-tax Act, 1961, S.37(3-A).

1994 PTD 878 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Year in which expenditure is allowableOrdinance levying market fees issued on 15-5-1980Demand for market fees made by Collector on 4-3-1983Market fees deductible in assessment year 1983-84

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.

1973 PTD 186 MADHYA-PRADESH-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-tax-Business expenditure-Lump sum payment by A & Co. to B & Co. to secure services of employee of B & Co.

Whether laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes Whether capital expenditure-Whether allowable-Indian Income-tax Act, 1961, S. 37.

1972 PTD 625 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income tax

Business expenditure Manufacture and sale of blankets and other woollen cloth-General Manager-.Commission ,a profits-Disallowance of part-Whether permissible-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv)-[J. K. Wooden Manufacturers (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax (1963) 48 I T R 346 reversed].

1972 PTD 445 GUJARAT-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-Business expenditure - Expenditure on getting technicians trained in U. S. A. for running existing business more efficiently and with Improved technique-Whether capital expenditure or business expenditure-Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv)Indian Income-tax Act, 1961, S. 37(1).Held, that, as the outlay in question was not made for the initiation of the business or for expansion of the business or for a substantial replacement of the equipment of the business, nor was it an expenditure for acquiring or bringing into existence an asset or an advantage of enduring nature to the business but it was made for running the business with a view to produce more profits and with a view to run the business more efficiently so as to produce higher profits, the Tribunal was right in taking the view that it did regarding these items of expenditure. The two sums of Rs. 71,625 and Rs. 50,000 were, therefore, correctly allowed by the Tribunal as items of revenue expenditure.

1972 PTD 126 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-tax

Business expenditure - Managing agency company-Expenses incurred by director on foreign tours to explore possibilities of expansion of business of managed companies-Whether allowable as business expenditure of managing agency company-Income-tax Act, 1922, S, 10(2) (xv).

1971 PTD 912 RAJASTHAN-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

-Business expenditure-Waiver of remuneration by managing agents in view of losses of managed company-Managed company subsequently making profits-Additional remuneration paid to managing agents-Whether allowable-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(1), (2)(xv).

1971 PTD 407 PATNA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business expenditure-Firm-Expenses of partner to earn his share of profits of firm-Whether deductible from partner's share of profits-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv).

1971 PTD 723 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-Business expenditure-Remuneration of directors Test of reasonableness - Factum of payment not disputed -Whether entire payment allowable - Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 10(2)(xv) & (4-A).

1971 PTD 533 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-Business expenditure-Fees paid to lawyer for appearing in proceedings to obtain new permits-Whether allowable-Expenses for registering trade mark distinguished-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv).

1971 PTD 161 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-Business expenditure-Whether reasonableness of expenditure can be gone into-Business of distribution and exhibition of films - Film exhibited for twenty-five weeks-Celebrations connected therewith-Expenditure incurred for presentations whether laid out for business and allowable-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv).

1971 PTD 839 KERALA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-tax

Business expenditure-Interest pail by assessee on loan borrowed by him for a firm of which he is a partner Whether allowable-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 10(1) & 16(3).

1971 PTD 764 KERALA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-Business expenditure - Purchase of allied concerns-Agreement by purchaser to pay the vendor a percentage of profit annually in addition to cash consideration-Share of profits paid to vendor-Whether allowable as business expenditure Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv).

1971 PTD 326 KERALA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-Business expenditure-Salary paid to manager or employee - Reasonableness - When assessing authorities may disallow whole or part - Guiding principles - Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv).

1971 PTD 184 GUJARAT-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business expenditure-Expenditure resulting in indirect benefit to business-Remuneration paid by managing agency company to its managing director for services rendered to managed company-Whether allowable -Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv).

1971 PTD 1031 DELHI-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
-Business expenditure

Hotel business - Initial issue of linen, blankets and uniforms-Expenses whether allowable Licence fees from stall-holders-Resolution after end of accounting year that licence fees likely to be reduced-Provision made in accounts as likely bad debt-Whole licence fees whether accrue during year-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv).

1971 PTD 609 DELHI-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business expenditure - Contribution to ruling political party-Whether allowable-Wealth tax for assessment year-Legal charges for obtaining loan-Whether allowable deductions - Development rebate - Sanitary and drainage fittings Whether "plant"-Insufficiency of material-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 10(1), 10(2)(vib) & 10(2) (xv).

1971 PTD 751 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business expenditure - Sole selling agency Agreement to pay commission on all sales-No sales effected by agent-Payment of commission to agent-Whether allowable Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv).

1971 PTD 55 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-Business expenditure-House property given as security to bank for overdraft to third party - Guarantee commission assessed as income-Whether municipal taxes paid allowable as expenditure solely incurred for earning profits

Heads of Income, whether distinct-Reference-Power of High Court to consider question referred from a new aspect-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 9, 12(2) & 66(1).

1971 PTD 1022 ALLAHABAD-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-tax-Business expenditure-Tests-Legal expenses Expenses benefiting others also -Imprudent expenditure

Whether allowable-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 12(2).

1971 PTD 294 ALLAHABAD-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business expenditure-Penalty paid for infraction of law-Default in paying cess levied under U. P. Sugarcane Cess Act, 1956-Whether allowable as business expenditure-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv).

1969 PTD 679 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 10 (2) (xvi) Business expenditure Remuneration of Managing Director Expenditure whether "wholly and exclusively" for purpose of business of company Important factor for determining question Whether expenditure incurred bona fide on ground of commercial expediency and not whether it is reasonable Such expenditure cannot be disallowed by applying some subjective standard of reasonableness.

1969 PTD 232 MADHYA-PRADESH-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business Expenditure

Gratuity paid to employee's on retirement-When allowable-General principles-Burden of proof Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv).

1969 PTD 220 MADHYA-PRADESH-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business Expenditure

Fees paid to income-tax advisers for conducting assessment proceedings-Law before, and after, 1939-Test of allowability-Commercial expediency-Income-tux Act, 1922, S.10(2) (xv) as amended in 1939.

1969 PTD 300 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

S. 10(2)(xvi) - Business expenditure-Claim for allowance of legal expenses incurred on criminal prosecution of assessee's employees-Prosecution must be shown to have arisen out of acts performed in ordinary course of business of assessee-Deductability of such expenses not dependent upon success or otherwise of defence-Primary test : whether expenses incurred wholly and exclusively for purpose of business.

1969 PTD 354 BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business Expenditure

Salaries of officers -In crease-Whether should be reflected in profits-No increase of salary of staff generally-Relationship to director-Effect-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10 (2) (xv).

1969 PTD 33 BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business Expenditure

Capital expenditure Agreement with ruler of Native State for monopoly rights, tax concessions and immunity from labour and industrial laws for a term of years Percentage of annual profits paid to ruler under agreement Capital expenditure-Non resident Income Receipt by cheque Remand by appellate Tribunal to provide opportunity to let in evidence regarding mode of sending cheques and request of assessee

Whether proper Income tax Act, 1922, Ss. 4(1) (a), 10 (xv),& 33.

1969 PTD 868 ALLAHABAD-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business Expenditure Monthly allowance paid to directors for financing the company-Whether business expenditure-Indian Income-tax Act, 1921, S. 10(2)(xv), (4-A).

1969 PTD 646 ALLAHABAD-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business Expenditure

Interest on money borrow-ed for purchase of shares for retaining managing agency-Whether allowable as business expenditure or as interest on borrowed capital-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 10(2)(xv) & 10(2)(iii)-Power to go into genuineness of transactions.

1969 PTD 7 ALLAHABAD-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business Expenditure

Commission paid to employee Power of Income tax authorities to disallow wholly or in part Applicability and scope of S. 10(2)(x), (xv) Tests for determining whether expenditure is allowable under S. 10(2)(.xv) Income tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(x), (xv) Law before and after 1953.

1968 PTD 319 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business Expenditure Business expenditure-Bad debt-Company-Amount advanced for purchase of shares in new company with object of obtaining selling agency-Failure of issue of shares in new company-Part of amount alone repaid-Balance of advance whether business expenditure-Whether bad debt.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Business Expenditure", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21177

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Business Expenditure"

PTD 2000
Tax Case No.756 of 1984 (Reference No.671 of 1984), decided on 4th February, 1997.

2000 P T D 2503

COMMISSIONER.OF INCOME-TAX Versus INDIA RADIATORS LTD.

Court: 236 I T R 719
PTD 2002
Income-tax References Nos.5 and 6 of 1982, decided on 22nd December, 1999.

2002 P T D 1710

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus HIRA LAL & SONS

Court: 242 I T R 407
PTD 2000
T. C. P. No. 345 of 1996, decided on 31st March, 1997.

2000 P T D 2624

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus BALAJI ENTERPRISES

Court: 236 I T R 589
PTD 1995
Civil Appeals Nos.2123, 2149, 2171, 2172, 2226, 2241 and 2245 of 1977, decided on 15th October, 1993.

1995 P T D 176

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus AHMEDABAD COTTON MFG. CO. LTD. and others

Court: 205 I T R 163
PTD 1999
Income-tax Reference No, of 1988, decided on 1st April, 1997

1999 P T D 2741

KHUSHAL SINGH SUBHASH CHANDER Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 228I T R 608
PTD 1998
Income-tax Case No. 15 of 1995, decided on 21st November, 1995.

1998 P T D 2522

MODI RUBBER LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 222 I T R 307
PTD 2001
Tax Case No.219 of 1986 (Reference No. 109 of 1986), decided on 23rd April, 1999.

2001 P T D 3274

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus SUNDARAM INDUSTRIES LTD.

Court: 240 I T R 335
PTD 1992
Income-tax Reference No. 22 of 1990, decided on 22nd April, 1991.

1992 P T D 1491

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus TIRRIHANNAH CO. LTD.

Court: Calcutta High Court (India)
PTD 1969
Income‑tax Reference No. 378 of 1963, decided on 17th January 1967.

1969 P T D 868

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, UTTAR PRADESH Versus MOTOR AND GENERAL SALES (P.) LTD.

Court: Allahabad (India)
PTD 2001
Income‑tax Reference No.58 of 1979, decided on 7th December, 1999.

2001 P T D 3803

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus RAJDEV SINGH & CO.

Court: 241 I T R 984