Home Maxims & Terms Is meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Is

Is legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1992 PTD 125 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Word "is"

Meaning of Raja Ram Agarwal and S.C. Manchanda, Senior Advocates with Dr. Meera Agarwal and R.C. Mishra for Appellant.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Is", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21195

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Is"

PLC 1990
Appeal No. MN‑83 of 1990/Pb., decided on 26th March, 1990.

1990 P L C 371

WOMEN CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL Versus Mst. SKINA YONIS

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1958
Regular Second Appeal No. 146 of 1954, decided on 29th October 1957, from the decree of the court of Sardar Atta Ullah, Additional District Judge, Gujrat, dated the 12th January 1954.

P L D 1958 (W

FAZAL AHMAD‑Plaintiff‑Appellant Versus Mst. RAKHI‑Defendant‑Respondent

Court:
MLD 1990
First Rent Appeal No. 564 of 1987, decided on 17th December, 1989.

1990 M L D 846

CAWAS A. NOSHIRWANI‑‑Appellant Versus Mrs. MEHER S. MOBED‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 2025
2025-March-24

2025 M L D 1001

Dr. Hassan Fatima, Sindh Medical Centre through attorney — Petitioner Versus Pakistan Red crescent society through Provincial Secretary and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLC 1984
First Rent Appeal No. 456 of 1982, decided on 5th September, 1983.

1984 C L C 1053

EJAZ AHMAD SIDDIQUI‑Appellant Versus Mst. AZIZ JEHAN BEGUM‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PTD 1992
I.T.As. Nos.64/IB and 65/IB of 1990-91, decided on 5th August, 1991.

1992 P T D 455

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2010
S.T.A. No.1572/LB of 2009; decided on 23rd April, 2010.

2010 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 1958
Writ Petition No. 437 of 1956, decided on 19th February 1958 under Article 170 of the Constitution.

P L D 1958 (W

MAHBOOB ALI MALIK‑Petitioner Versus (1) CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF LAHORE.

Court: Only directory‑Corporation competent to make an appointment under Bye‑law 9 (2) without compliance first with Bye‑law 9 (1) Per Kaikaus, J., Akhlaque Husain, J. contra:
PLD 1958
Regular Second Appeal No. 422 of 1956, decided on 25th November 1957, from the decree of Zia Ullah Khan, Senior Civil Judge, Lahore, dated the 9th June 1957, reversing that of Zafar Ahsan Mahmood, Civil Judge, IV Class, Lahore, dated the 31st January 1955.

P L D 1958 (W

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus RIAZ ALI KHAN‑Plaintiff‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 2016
2016-January-18

P L D 2016 Islamabad 67

UCH POWER PRIVATE LIMITED — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court