Home Maxims & Terms Local Rate meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Local Rate

Local Rate legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1981 PTD 40 INCOME-TAX-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Word "local rate"-Held, includes water rate paid to Irrigation Department. Province of West Pakistan v. Malik Khizar Hayat Tiwana P L D 1963 S C 423 and C. I. T., .New Delhi v. Bakhshi Bhagchand (1961) 42 I T R 657 ref.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Local Rate", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21223

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Local Rate"

PLD 1948
Privy Council Appeal No. 47 of 1946, decided on 13th January, 1948, from the Board of Revenue United Provinces of Agra and Oudh.

P

HARDAT RAM and others-Appellants Versus THAKUR PARAS NATH and others-Respondents

Court:
PLD 1948
Privy Council Appeal No. 37 of 1947, decided on 8th April, 1948, from the Court of the Board of Revenue United Provinces of Agra and Oudh.

P L D 1948 Privy Council 197

Guru Prohit Pandit BHARAT RAJ-Appellant Versus B. PARSHOTTAM DASS and others-Respondents

Court:
PTD 1981
I. T. A. No. 1310 of 1976-77, decided on 12th June, 1980.

1981 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal
PTD 1968
Income‑tax Referred Cases Nos. 6, 7 and 8 of 1960 (Agricultural), decided on 28th March 1962.

1968 P T D 944

ANANTHAPADMANABHA IYER Versus COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME‑TAX, TRIVANDRUM

Court: Kerala (India)
PTD 1989
I.T.As. Nos. 2259/KB and 2260/KB of 1985-86, decided on 20th September, 1988.

1989 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1997
I.T.A. No.3069/LB of 1991-92, decided on 4th January, 1996

1997 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 1972
Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 2044o 207 of 1965, decided on 21st February 1972.

P L D 1972 Karachi 421

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN PATEL‑Appellant‑Applicant Versus GAFFAR WALI MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS ‑Respondents

Court: of increase in existingf ifiscal burden‑Agha Ali Hyder, J. contra.
SCMR 1980
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 740 of 1979, decided on 11th December, 1979.

1980 S C M R 570

ABDUR RASHID-Petitioner Versus Hakeem MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE-Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 481 of 1979, decided on 16th March, 1980.

1981 S C M R 767

BASHIR AHMAD-Petitioner Versus Malik ABDUL ALI KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: -- Art. 144-Adverse possession-Mere proof of having occupied disputed shop illegally-Not enough particularly in view of evidence of respondent's agent stating to have been regularly collecting rent from petitioner until about 2 years before suit when petitioner refused payment - Petitioner in order to prove his adverse possession ought to have produced evidence in rebuttal Petitioner, had he really asserted his title to shop, would not have stood by and permitted respondents to have rates and taxes for said shop being paid to local municipality-Concurrent findings of lower~;~, appellate Courts, drawing adverse inference against petitioner held, supported by ample evidence and not open to interference.Adverse possession.
CLC 1999
1998-December-4

1999 C L C 834

ZILEDAR alias NOOR MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus TOWN COMMITTEE, FAROOQA through

Court: Lahore