Home Maxims & Terms Incompetency meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Incompetency

Incompetency legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1991 MLD 2020 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases

Term "incompetency", means lack of ability, legal qualification or fitness to discharge the required duty.

1988 MLD 619 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesWords "incompetent" or "bad"Connotation of

Word "incompetent" would connote lacking adequate powers; lacking proper, legal qualifications; grossly deficient in ability for one's work

Word "bad" would mean as incorrect, faulty or worthless.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Incompetency", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21257

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Incompetency"

SCMR 1987
Civil Petition No. 1007 of 1986, decided on 27th April, 1987.

1987 S C M R 1153

Mst. HAJRAN RHATOON and others Petitioners Versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER PUNJAB and others‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1997
1994-July-27

1997 P Cr

Mst. AZIZ FATIMA through ADVOCATE-GENERAL and another — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 1987
1984-August-12

1987 M L D 303

Messrs METALOCK — Appellant Versus Messrs DUKER'S METALOCK COMPANY — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PTD 2010
I.T.A. No.983/LB of 2009, decided on 19th January, 2010.

2010 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 1982
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 721 of 1981, decided on 2nd November 1981.

Present : Karam Elahee Chauhan and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

Mst. MAQBOOL BEGUM ETC. ‑Petitioners Versus GULLAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
MLD 2007
2006-September-25

2007 M L D 1664

ABDUL MAJEED — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR, EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT, FARID KOT HOUSE, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 2001
Appeal No.2800 of 1999, decided on 2nd March, 2000.

2001 P L C (C

MUNEER AHMAD, EX‑PTC TEACHER Versus DIRECTOR EDUCATION (E), DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, D.G. KHAN and 2 others

Court: Punjab Service Tribunal
SCMR 1988
Civil Petition No.192 of 1981, decided on 5th July, 1988.

1988 S C M R 1682

Government of Punjab and 2 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN, A.S. I. — Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1997
N/A

1997 P Cr

MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 208-R of 1979, decided on 16th February, 1980.

1981 SCMR 554

W. C. AUSTIN-Petitioner Versus PUNJAB CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS Respondents

Court: ----Art. 201(2) & (3)(b)-Seniority--Terms and conditions of service- Seniority-Held, not included within meaning of expression "terms and conditions of service"-.-.Appeal arising out of an order relating to seniority in consequence incompetent.-Civil services.