Renew
Renew legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
'Renew' means `restore to original state, make (as good) as new'.
"Renew", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21320
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Renew"
2020 S C M R 206
PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA) through Secretary — Petitioner Versus TRADE SERVE INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. LAHORE and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1957 Supreme Court (India) 411
V. C. K. BUS SERVICE LTD‑Appellant Versus THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY COIMBATORE‑Respondent
Court: High Court1991 M L D 1212
THE PAKISTAN MOTOR TRANSPORT and others — Petitioners Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1960 (W
NISAR‑UL‑HAQ B. BI LLIMORIA‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Punjab Excise Act (I of 1914), S. 43 read with r. 5.12, Punjab Liquor Licence Rules‑Rule S 12 not mere direction‑Refusal to renew licence must be preceded by issue of notice to licensee in terms of r. 5.12‑Government's omission to make a valid order of refusal‑Implies decision to renew‑Licensee has no right to "claim" renewal in view of S. 43‑Muhammad Asghar v. Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab, Lahore P L D 1955 Lah. 167 dissented from.2024 C L C 479
The COMMUNICATORS (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY — Respondent
Court: IslamabadP L D 2017 Lahore 563
TRADE SERVE INTERNATIONAL (PRIVATE) LIMITED and others — Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1989 M L D 1897
MANSUR ALI and 13 others — Appellants Versus HABIB BANK Ltd. — Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1962 W
THE CHEEMA TRANSPORT COMPANY, LYALLPUR-Appellant Versus THE NEW LYALLPUR-SAMUNDRI TRANSPORT Co. LTD., GROUP `B', LYALLPUR AND R. T. A., LAHORE-Respondents
Court:2007FTO6038
Messrs ISLAM BROTHERS Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax OmbudsmanP L D 1964 Supreme Court 593
(COLLECTOR) MULTAN REGION, MULTAN‑Appellants Versus MESSRS NISAR‑UL‑HAQ B. BILLIMORIA‑Respondents
Court: