Presence
Presence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
"Physical presence" means existence of a person in a particular place at a given time with reference to a particular act or happening
"Presence" is opposite of "absence" which connotes non-existence.
"Presence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21325
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Presence"
1999 M L D 2536
MUHAMMAD MAQBOOL — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR and others — Respondents
Court: Board of Revenue Punjab1991 M L D 1957
MUHAMMAD HAMAYUN KHAN — Petitioner Versus ALI ASGHAR KHAN and 10 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar1989 P L C (C
SHER BAZ KHAN Versus WAPDA
Court: Federal Service Tribunal2004 P Cr
AMIR MOINULLAH KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus Mst. SABAR JANA and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Peshawar1995 M L D 8
ABDUL MAJID and 2 others — Petitioners Versus ABDUL GHANI — Respondent
Court: Lahore1982 S C M R 471
JAMAL DIN AND ANOTHER — Petitioners Versus RAMZAN AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: ---Art. 188-Review-Contention that petitioner A. O. R. though present when appeal decided yet case not "called" during his presence and although counsel having to argue appeal not present at relevant time yet he reached court-room soon there after-Held : Not necessary to call out case by pronouncement of names of parties outside Court in presence of parties' A. O. R.-A. O. R. signify their presence as soon as case called out by Court Associate in court-room-Case called out in Court by Court Associate and respondent's counsel also citing case-law-Contention that A. O. R. would have defended appeal only upon being called upon to do so by Court-Naive-A. O. R. desiring to argue appeal himself instead of counsel-Has to state so No assertion ever made of A. O. R. having stated his desire to argue appeal-A. O. R. in circumstances himself responsible for not arguing appeal-Circumstance of counsel briefed to argue appeal having arrived subsequent to decision-Not relevant for purpose of reconsideration of decision in review.-Review by Supreme Court.2017 P Cr
SALEH MUHAMMAD and another — Appellants Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Balochistan2025 P Cr
Shiraz Ahmad — Petitioner Versus The State and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2006 M L D 1911
ABDUL SATTAR — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi2023 M L D 863
ALTAF and 3 others — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)