Home Maxims & Terms Commencement meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Commencement

Commencement legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1990 MLD 1725 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases

Word "commencement" is not of wide sweep and relates to bringing of the first step.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Commencement", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21382

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Commencement"

PLD 2001
First Rent Appeal No.423 of 1995, decided on 24th May, 2001.

P L D 2001 Karachi 415

AMANULLAH KHAN LEGHARI‑‑‑Appellant Versus ADIB SHAIKH AHMED ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑‑S. 21‑A as inserted by Sindh Rented Premises (Amendment) Ordinance (XIV of 2001)‑‑‑Promulgation of amending Ordinance‑‑‑Commencement of ‑‑‑Commencement clause‑‑‑Necessity‑‑‑Amending Ordinance promulgated i through publication he official Gazette contained a commencement clause which had stated that it would conic into force at once‑‑‑Insertion of such clause in the Ordinance had reflected lack of knowledge of principles of legislative drafting on the part of its drafter because the words "at once" used in the clause did not specify the moment when the Ordnance was to come into force‑‑‑Whether said words would mean the moment when Authority/Governor had signed the Ordinance, was not clear‑‑‑Ordinance would come into force on its promulgation and that did not necessarily require a commencement clause‑‑‑Commencement clause, if found necessary, should mention that it would come into force on publication in the Gazette or on its promulgation‑‑‑Commencement clause in a Bill or Ordinance was not always necessary‑‑‑Commencement clause was usually required when commencement was subject to any future eventuality or different provisions were to be enforced on different occasions‑‑‑Ordinance would come into force on its promulgation on the authority under which it was issued and an Act would come into force, unless expressly provided otherwise, as soon as it was assented to by the President or the Governor.
PTD 2012
I.T.A. No.352/IB of 2011, decided on 5th October, 2011.

2012 P T D (Trib

Messrs LAFARGE PAKISTAN CEMENT LTD., ISLAMABAD Versus C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan
PTD 2025
S.T.R. No.41 of 2024, decided on 29th April, 2025.

2025 P T D 932

RUKSHANDA ASAD Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and others

Court: Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench)
MLD 1999
1998-July-27

1999 M L D 1831

ABDUL AZIZ — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD JAMIL and 7 others — Respondents

Court: Shariat Court (AJ&K)
PTD 2001
Tax Case No. 1909 of 1984 (Reference No. 1392 of 1984), decided on 17th r February, 1998.

2001 P T D 3649

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus ELECTRON INDIA

Court: 241 I T R 166
PLD 1955
Civil Reference Case No. 4 of 1952, on decided 1st July, 1955.

P L D 1955 Lahore 621

Court:
PTD 2021
Income Tax Reference No.376 of 2010, decided on 6th August, 2020.

2021 P T D 1088

Messrs ATTOCK GEN LTD. REFINERY, P.O. MORGAH, RAWALPINDI through Chief Executive Versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, RAWALPINDI and 2 others

Court: Islamabad High Court
CLC 1995
Notification No. F. 20(1)/94‑Law (Petition under Article 218 of the Constitution), decided on 9th March, 1995.

1995 C L C 1225

Dr. NAILA REHMAN CHEEMA‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Cabinet Division Islamabad and 9 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Election Commission of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2022
Civil Appeals Nos. 290 to 297 of 2022, decided on 2nd June, 2022.

2022 P L C (C

BADSHAH ZAMIN and others Versus SIRAJ KHAN and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2022
Civil Appeals Nos. 290 to 297 of 2022, decided on 2nd June, 2022.

2022 S C M R 1471

BADSHAH ZAMIN and others — Appellants Versus SIRAJ KHAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan