Home Maxims & Terms Decisive Step meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Decisive Step

Decisive Step legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1990 MLD 1802 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Decisive step"

Connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Decisive Step", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21384

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Decisive Step"

PLC(CS) 2026
Writ Petition No.11695 of 2024 (with other connected petitions), decided on 16th December, 2025.

2026 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD TAHIR BASHIR Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others

Court: Lahore High Court (Multan Bench)
MLD 1985
Writ Petition No. 198 of 1984, decided on 9th June, 1985.

1985 M L D 137

Syed KHALID BASHIR and 148 others — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1990
Writ Petition No. 264 of 1986, decided on 22nd May, 1990.

1990 M L D 1802

Ch. IRSHAD AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary, Finance Division Islamabad‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1980
Writ Petition No. 768 of 1979, decided on 20thDecember, 1979.

P L D 1980 Peshawar 128

MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAKI‑Petitioner Versus VICE‑CHANCELLOR, GOMAL UNIVERSITY, D. I. KHAN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑ S. 21‑Locus Poenitentiae (power to recede)‑Decisive step‑Power of receding‑Available till order takes legal effect‑‑Order taking effect and certain rights created in favour of individual in pursuance of such order‑"Decisive step" deemed in such case to have been taken and order cannot be withdrawn or rescinded‑Petitioner, selected for admission in an Institute, duly informed of same, called for interview and tests, appearing and apparently successful, selected, and asked to join on a specified date‑Valuable right, held, accrued to petitioner to claim benefit of admission to Institute and such right could not be recalled unless secured by fraud‑Right not alleged to have been secured by fraud, order recalling recommendation for admission, in circumstances, held further, of no legal effect and set aside.‑Educational institution.
PTD 1997
Writ Petition No. 5999 of 1996, decided on 3rd October, 1996

1997 P T D 68

Messrs MEHRAN FEED INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 2000
Writ Petition No.2215 of 1992, decided on 10th November, 1999.

2000 C L C 654

AZRA PARVEEN and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

Court: Lahore
MLD 1991
N/A

1991 M L D 1605

MUHAMMAD BILAL — Petitioner Versus THE PRINCIPAL, NATIONAL COLLEGE OF TEXTILE ENGINEERING, FAISALABAD — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2019
Civil Petitions Nos. 1696-L to 1706-L of 2018 and Civil Petition No.3569-L of 2016, decided on 28th February, 2019.

2019 S C M R 643

GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT through Secretary Higher Education, Punjab Civil Secretariat Lahore and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD IMRAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1987
Intra‑Court Appeal No.152 of 1985, decided on 3rd June, 1987.

1987 P L C (C

Syed KHALID BASHIR and others Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB and others.

Court: Lahore High Court
SCMR 1980
Criminal Appeals Nos. K-31 and K-347 -of 1969, decided on 20th January 1974.

1980 S C M R 268

THE STATE — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: - S. 21-Locus poenitentiae-Sanction for prosecution-Earlier order for departmental inquiry given effect to and an Enquiry Officer appointed in pursuance of such order-Decisive step taken-No locus poenitentiae, held, left in Government to revise such order and accord sanction for prosecution of Government servant-Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act (XL of 1958) S. 5(6)-Jalal Din v. M. Sheikh Muhammad Rajiq P L D 1965 S C 261 and Abdul Majid v. Chief Settlement Commissioner P L D 1967 S C 437 held not applicable. Sanction for prosecution.