PLD
1969
Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 162 of 1962, decided on 29th June 1966.
KABIR ARMED MASTER AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus LOKMAN ARMED AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (a) Bengal Land Revenue Sales Act (XI of 1859), S. 37 --Under tenure ‑ Annulment of. by auction ‑ purchaser at revenue sale‑Prerequisites‑Expression of intention to avoid incumbrance and bringing such intent‑on to knowledge of incum brancer‑Formal written notice expressing such intention not essential‑Unequivocal act indicating such intention, sufficient -Institution of suit for ejectment held, positive indication and sufficient notice of intention to annul "when summons is served on defendant"‑Khalil Ahmed Chowdhury v. Muhammad Shamsul Anwar Choudhury and others P L D 1959 Dacca 509; Monmohan Chowdhury v. Messrs Turner Morrison & Co. 33 C W N 930; Shahodra Mudiali v. Nabin Chand Poral 19 C W N 1030 and Srimati Krishna Kalyani v. R. Braunfeld 20 C W N 1028 ref..
ALLAH DITTA and 3 others — Petitioners Versus IMAM DIN and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore
PCRLJ
1987
Criminal Petition No. 164/B of 1987, decided on 4th February, 1987.
DILAWAR HUSSAIN‑ ‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore
PCRLJ
1987
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 48/B of 1987, decided on 21st January, 1987.
SHAFIQUE AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore
PLC(CS)
2025
----R. 36(c)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Employment---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Rules governing the service of employees of National Bank of Pakistan (NBP)---Whether statutory or non-statutory---Determination---Laches---Petitioner being aggrieved of his demotion to a lower grade without specifying any period sought reinstatement to his original position---Respondent-Bank pleaded non-maintainability of the constitutional petition on the counts of laches and non-statutory Rules of National Bank of Pakistan---Validity---Petitioner had impugned memorandums of his demotion and dismissal of his departmental appeal decided on merits without being time barred---Computation of time relevant to the doctrine of laches would commence from the date of the later memorandum---Constitutional petition was filed a mere 18 days subsequent to memorandum of dismissal of appeal of the petitioner, thus, constitutional petition was not hit by laches---National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Service Rules, 1973, were held to be statutory---Departmental proceedings were initiated against the petitioner in the year 2011, which were culminated upon passing of his demotion order in the year 2013, thus, Rules of 1973 being statutory applied to the petitioner's case, meaning thereby that NBP, as a statutory corporation, was subject to the writ jurisdiction of High Court under Art. 199 of the Constitution---Findings recorded by the Inquiry Officer, predicated on substantial evidence and an exhaustive examination of the case, were immune from interference in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction---Interference in such findings would egregiously undermine the integrity of the administrative process and the inviolable principle of finality of administrative decisions---It is imperative that the judiciary respects the meticulously established processes to handle such inquiries, except where there is compelling evidence of procedural impropriety or a palpable violation of fundamental rights---Punitive measures, including demotions, must not be of an indefinite duration, thus, impugned memorandums were modified to the extent that the punitive measure of degradation to a lower stage/grade was specified to be an effective for two years from the date of initial memorandum---Constitutional petition was disposed of, in circumstances.
Syed MAHMOOD JAFFAR ZAIDI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Division, Islamabad and 2 others
Court: Sindh High Court
MLD
1987
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1315-B of 1987; decided on 18th May, 1987.
KA LSOOM — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore
PCRLJ
1987
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3621/13 of 1986, decided on 28th January, 1987.
MUHAMMAD NIAZ alias NAZ and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore
MUHAMMAD NAVEED AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence,
Court: Karachi
PTD
2018
I.T.A. No.1524/LB of 2016, decided on 6th March, 2017.
Messrs OILCO TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD Versus C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
PCRLJ
1971
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1961/H of 1970, decided on 14th April 1970.
Mst. RABLA BIBI‑Petitioner Versus ZILLADAR KHAN AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Lahore
