Home Maxims & Terms Timber Extraction meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Timber Extraction

Timber Extraction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1990 MLD 2333 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases ......Timber extraction"

Meaning. A Handbook of Forest Utilization by Tribhawan Mehta, p. 37 ref.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Timber Extraction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21398

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Timber Extraction"

GBLR 2010
N/A

2010 G B L R 79

KAMARAN KHAN and 6 others — Petitioners Versus SECRETARY FOR KASHMIR AND NORTHERN AREAS AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Northern Areas Supreme Appellate Court
PTD 1969
Income‑tax Case No. 1 of 1963, decided on 8th November 1967.

1969 P T D 885

Rai Bahadur Lala JODHA MAL KUTHIALA (KASHMIR) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana (India)
MLD 2016
2016-January-19

2016 M L D 2023

SOHRAB KHAN and 17 others — Petitioners Versus NOOR MUHAMMAD and 9 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2015
H.R.C. No. 4729-P of 2011 in S.M.C. No. 3 of 2009, decided on 14th July, 2015.

2015 S C M R 1779

N/A

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1972
Civil Miscellaneous No. 38 of 1971.

P L D 1972 Azad J & K 80

BRIG. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF AZAD J & K‑Respondent

Court:
PLC(CS) 1991
‑‑‑‑S. 4‑‑‑Dismissal from service‑‑‑Appellant a Forester was first suspended for absence from place of duty and then was dismissed when he allegedly failed to submit his reply to show‑cause notice and to a appear for personal hearing‑‑‑Appellant, however, claimed to have submitted his defence within stipulated time‑‑‑Record showed that during departmental proceedings no documentary evidence was produced to prove that appellant was absent from duty and his case was decided on basis of a single note by Range Officer who allegedly had developed grudge against him and submitted his report in twenty days instead of filing it immediately‑‑‑Possibility existed that departmental proceedings against appellant were result of malice on part of Reporting Officer‑‑‑Appellant was stated by Reporting Officer to be true to his duty in the past but when he applied for Leave Preparatory to Retirement to the disliking of Reporting Officer, he was stated to have become a truant and a delinquent in less than twenty months‑‑‑No documentary evidence was produced against appellant in departmental proceedings which were concluded ex parte‑‑‑Held, punishment of dismissal from service awarded to appellant was too harsh‑‑‑Order of dismissal of appellant from service was changed to his compulsory retirement in circumstances.

1991 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ZOHRAB Versus CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS and another

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
MLD 1990
1990-August-11

1990 M L D 2333

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD — Appellant Versus Brig. (Retd.) MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
CLD 2020
2019-September-2

2020 C L D 531

Khawaja MUHAMMAD AKBAR and 4 others — Petitioners Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Secretary Forest, Muzaffarabad and 9 others — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
MLD 2000
Civil Miscellaneous No. l with No. 3 of 1998, decided on 22nd May, 2000.

2000 M L D 1740

SHAH HANIF and 20 others‑‑‑Applicants Versus Col. YAR MUHAMMAD KHAN and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 2003
2003-January-24

P L D 2003 Supreme Court 491

GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Chief Secretary and others — Petitioners Versus ALL RESIDENTS OF THORIANDEH and MULDEH, TEHSIL AYUN, DISTRICT CHITRAL through Representatives and others — Respondents

Court: High Court