Home Maxims & Terms Additional Evidence meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Additional Evidence

Additional Evidence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1999 YLR 144 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Additional evidence "Meaning

Words "additional" connotes that something is to be added or supplemented meaning thereby that some statement is to be got recorded in addition to or as supplement to the evidence already recorded.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Additional Evidence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21436

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Additional Evidence"

CLC 2017
2016-April-28

2017 C L C 59

M. ABID — Appellant Versus AHMED AZAD and 96 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
CLC 1990
Civil Revision No.716 of 1986, heard on 3rd October, 1989.

1990 C L C 1446

FAZAL HUSSAIN and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus NAWAB DIN‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2021
C.P.L.A. No. 832-L of 2016, decided on 29th June, 2021.

2021 S C M R 1480

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Petitioner Versus GUL NAWAZ and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2002
Civil Revision No. 196 of 2001, decided on 28th September, 2001

2002 C L C 879

AMANULLAH KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUR REHMAN‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Peshawar
MLD 1992
Civil Revision No.283 and Civil Miscellaneous No. 1‑C of 1992, decided on 26th February, 1992.

1992 M L D 1219

SIKANDAR and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus QAMAR DIN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1996
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 598/L of 1995, decided on 24th January, 1996.

1996SCMR598

EJAZ MUHAMMAD KHAN and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. SAHIB BIBI through Shazad Khan and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1983
Civil Revision No. 777 of 1980, heard on 24th January, 1983.

P L D 1983 Lahore 349

Mst. UMARI AND ANOTHER-Appellants Versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: -- O. XLI, r. 27 read with S. 115-Additional evidence, production of-Contention that O. XLI, r. 27 provides only for ssto motu exercise of powers by appellate Court and no party has any right to file application rejected - Held, party can avail benefit of O. XLI, r. 27 and submit application for production of additional evidence-Power under O. XLI, r. 27 not suo motu alone-Words "the parties to an appeal shall not be entitled to produce additional evidence" and "allow"-Meaning-Appellate Court before whom an application for allowing to. produce additional evidence filed, held, under legal obligation to decide same before main appeal and failure to advert to and decide same amounts to failure to exercise jurisdiction-District Judge deciding main appeal and passing judgment and decree without deciding application to allow production of additional evidence-Judgment and decree of District Judge set aside by ,High Court in revision and case remanded for decision afresh as per direction:-Evidence-Words and phrases.
CLC 2015
2014-June-25

2015 C L C 761

KHALID IBRAHIM through L.Rs. and others — Petitioners Versus Chaudhry MAZHAR HUSSAIN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2018
N/A

2018 M L D 1303

Mrs AMNA NAWAZ — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 1999
Writ Petition No.486 of 1999, decided on 5th March, 1999.

1999 Y L R 184

FAHIM SAULAT through Special Attorney‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore