Questions Involved
Questions Involved legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.
"Questions Involved", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21440
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Questions Involved"
1992 C L C 700
ALTAF PAREKH‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus DELMENTS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY‑‑‑Defendant
Court: Karachi1991 C L C 302
Director‑General‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. RUBI NASREEN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2007 P T D 2345
PROVINCE OF SINDH and others Versus Messrs CRESCENT BOARD LIMITED, KARACHI
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1990 S C M R 952
TILLA GUL and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & LAND CUSTOMS,
Court: ‑‑‑‑S.220 as repealed by Customs Act (IV of 1969)‑‑‑Tribal Areas (Application of Acts) Regulation, 1965‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal‑‑‑Question involved was whether Act VIII of 1878 was applicable to Khyber Agency and Torkham Land Customs Station despite its repeal‑‑‑High Court had found that Custom officers in Tribal areas, notwithstanding repeal of Act, would continue to exercise power conferred upon them under said Act in pursuance of Regulation 1965‑‑‑View taken by High Court had been contended on ground that Regulation was of no avail after repeal of Act, 1878‑‑‑Question involved in case being one of law and of considerable general importance, leave to appeal was granted.P L D 1997 Karachi 659
Mst. SHAHEEN .Plaintif Versus KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY ‑Defendant
Court:1979CLC891
SANAULLAH KHAN-Petitioner Versus LAHORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, LAHORE
Court: LahoreP L D 1991 Karachi 205
ZAHOORUDDIN‑‑Applicant Versus HAJI HUSSAIN through his Legal Heirs
Court: ‑‑‑‑0. XLI, R.1‑‑‑Application filed before Appellate Court touching question involved in appeal‑‑‑Court's duty‑‑‑Court would be under obligation to entertain all or any applications/matters filed before it‑‑‑Court could not altogether ignore any application filed before it touching the question involved in appeal and proceed to decide the same without so much as even taking note of such application‑‑‑Court was also fixed with a further duty to take up and dispose of a matter brought before it in accordance with law viz. either to accept or reject the same but in accordance with law.‑‑Duty of Court. p. 207 A & B1981 C L C 409
Mst. KHATOON AND 3 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus SIDDIQ MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1982 S C M R 433
SYED SHAH — Petitioner Versus POLITICAL AGENT, BAJAUR AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: ----Art. 185 (3) read with Art. 247 (7)--Leave to appeal-Petitioner obtaining admission in Medical College on basis of domicile certificate issued by competent authority but such certificate later revoked on ground of having not been issued after proper inquiry-Constitutional' petition being filed by petitioner challenging such revocation Judges of High Court divided in opinion whether constitutional petition could lie in matter in view of bar contained in Art. 247 (7) of Constitution (1973)-Matter referred to third Judge and such Judge holding lack of jurisdiction in superior Courts and constitutional petition being not maintainable-Question involved concerning jurisdiction of superior Courts, High Court being divided in opinion and matter having to be referred to a third Judge, and direct effect of revocation of domicile certificate being cancellation of admission of petitioner in an institution located in a territory falling within jurisdiction of superior Courts, questions involved held, questions of general public importance---Leave to appeal granted.-Leave to appeal.1984 C L C 2452
HUSSAIN MILLS LTD.‑Applicant Versus Revision Application No. 175 of 1983, decided on 22nd December, 1983.
Court: Karachi