Home Maxims & Terms Trespasser meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Trespasser

Trespasser legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2025 MLD 428 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 8 & 42Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 28 & First Sched., Art. 144Suit for possessionMaintainabilityJudgments at varianceAdverse possessionTrespasserRevenue Officer in demarcation proceedings found the petitioners as encroachers upon the property in dispute

Suit for possession instituted by the respondent/plaintiff was dismissed, but the Appellate Court allowed the appeal of the respondent/plaintiff and decreed the suit in his favour

Contention of the petitioners was that suit for possession was not maintainable being time barred and having been filed without seeking declaration of title

Validity

Respondent purchased property from Khasra No.746, however, possession was handed over to him from Khasra Nos.745 and 746 as the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners was owner in both the Khasras, thus, petitioners had not thrown any serious challenge to the title of the respondent and as such objection of the petitioners qua maintainability of suit for possession was without any force

Person is only obliged to seek declaration when somebody is interested to deny his legal right or character as ordained in S. 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877

Petitioners were claiming protection of their possession on the plea of "adverse possession", thus, when they had no title to the suit property, they could only be termed as "trespassers"

With the afflux of time illegal possession upon the property of the other, irrespective of howsoever long it is, would not extinguish the ownership of the actual owner and validate the possession of trespasser

Knocking out the respondent on account of limitation would amount to giving premium to the petitioners under the obsolete provisions of law i.e. S.28 and Art. 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which had already been declared as deviant to the Quranic Injunctions

Civil revision was dismissed, in circumstances.

2001 YLR 1874 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
TrespasserRights

Trespasser has no vested right.

2000 YLR 915 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
TrespasserRights

Trespasser has no vested right in the property.

1962 PLD 253 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Trespasser -Meaning. Trespass means that a person or party has obtained possession of property unlawfully.

1959 PLD 61 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
TrespasserLurking house-trespass and house-trespass

Intention essence and gist of.

1958 PLD 128 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Trespasser -Recovery of possession from-Decree for eviction of trespasser can validly be passed in a suit by one of co-sharers where all remaining co-sharers are made parties.

1957 PLD 43 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Trespasser

Suit for possession against, by only one of two co-sharers-Decree-Extent.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Trespasser", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21483

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Trespasser"

PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 380, of 1985,heard on 25th August, 1985.

1986 P Cr

ABDUL RAUF‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1960
First Appeal No. 5 of 1957, decided on 14th October, 1960.

P L D 1960 (W

THE PROVINCE‑OF WEST PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus ALTAF HUSSAIN SHAH‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 1992
R.S.A. No. 312 of 1967, decided on 13th July, 1992.

1992 C L C 2369

JAVED IQBAL ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN and others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1995
Criminal Bail Application No.308 of 1994, decided on 28th July, 1994.

1995 M L D 368

HAZARO alias MUHAMMAD RAMZAN‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2012
2012-April-9

2012 P Cr

ABDUL KHALIQUE and 3 others — Applicants Versus 4TH CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KHAIRPUR and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1959
Criminal Reference No. 398 of 1958, decided on 26th November 1958.

P L D 1959 (W

THE STATE‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ZAKI and another‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1952
Criminal Revision No. 45 of 1951, decided on 4th June 1951.

P L D 1952 Dacca 30

ISHAQUE KHALIFA and another‑Accused‑Petitioners Versus CROWN‑Opposite‑Party

Court:
YLR 2019
Criminal Acquittal Appeal No.106 of 2017, decided on 6th November, 2017.

2019 Y L R 204

Capt. Syed MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Appellant Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1953
Revision Petition No. 54 of 1953, decided on 7th May 1953, against the order dated 19th May 1951 of Sher Bahadur Khan, Magistrate, 1st Class, Mardan.

P L D 1953 Peshawar 62

SARFRAZ KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 1988
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 303 of 1985, heard on 13th September, 1987.

1988 P Cr

Haji MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi