Home Maxims & Terms Issues meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Issues

Issues legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1970 PLD 643 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Issues Issues-Framing of issues-Issues can be framed only on basis of allegations made by parties in their pleadings-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XIV, rr. 1 & 3.

1963 PLD 397 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Issues Issues-Recast after hearing full arguments in case with concurrence of parties-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XIV, r. 5.

1958 PLD 63 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Issues Not relied on by parties-Court should either strike them off or refrain from giving any finding on them-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XIV, r. 5 (2). The parties produced evidence on all the issues; but at the time of arguments in the trial Court counsel for parties stated that the first two issues had no bearing on the merits of the case and refrained from addressing the Court on them. In vie-w of this, the Court found both the issues in favour of the plaintiff.

1956 PLD 348 SINDH-CHIEF-COURT Judicial Precedent

Issues Fiscal Legislation-Principle of The principle of all fiscal legislation is that if the person sought to be .taxed comes within the letter of the law, he must be taxed, however great the hardship may appear to the judicial mind to be. On the other hand if the Crown, seeking to recover the tai, cannot bring the subject within the letter of the law, the subject is free, however apparently within the spirit of the law, the case might otherwise appear to be.

1953 PLD 32 BAGHDAD-UL-JADID Judicial Precedent

Issues Issue-Defective and overlapping-Parties however adduced all necessary evidence-Case need not be remanded for forming issues afresh-Appellate Court to decide appeal on merits.

1949 PLD 270 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent

Pleadings-Issues-Determination of case on issues arising from pleadings. The determinations in a cause should be founded upon a case to be found in the pleadings or involved in or consistent with the case thereby made.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Issues", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21499

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Issues"

MLD 1996
1995-January-10

1996 M L D 55

RAZA HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus Haji QAISAR IQBAL and 7 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2021
2021-June-15

2021 C L C 1491

PARVEEN AKHTAR and 2 others — Petitioners Versus AKHLAQ AHMED and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2025
N/A

2025 C L C 306

MANZOOR ELAHI — Petitioner Versus REHMAT ALI — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)
CLC 2025
N/A

2025 C L C 323

ABDUL RAHMAN and others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLRN 2018
C.F.A. No.40 of 2015, decided on 5th September, 2016.

2018 Y L R Note 130

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Manager and another — Appellants Versus QAMAR KHAN — Respondent

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
CLC 1980
17th September 1979

1980 C L C 635

MUHAMMAD SHARIF-Appellant Versus ROSHAN DIN AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1980
Suit No. 1176 of 1978, decided on 10th March, 1980.

P L D 1980 Karachi 412

PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN. Versus P. & O. AND B. I. (STRATH SERVICES CUNARD BROCKLEBANK), KARACHI AND ANOTHER-Defendants

Court:
YLRN 2018
C.F.A. No. 67 of 2016, decided on 18th April, 2017.

2018 Y L R Note 125

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (I.G.P.) GILGIT-BALTISTAN and 2 others — Appellants Versus IJLAL HUSSAIN — Respondent

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
CLC 1984
Revision Application No.30 of 1982, decided on 26th February,~1984.

1984 C L C 2675

OMAR‑‑Applicant Versus SANJAR (REPRESENTED BY HIS HEIRS)

Court: ‑‑‑S‑115‑‑Limitation‑‑Bar of‑‑Objection that suit was hit by limitation‑ Plea not raised at earlier stage of litigation‑‑Issue a mixed question of law and fact‑‑Plea, held, could not be raised for first time in revision. Limitation.
MLD 1990
Civil Revision No. 403 of 1990, decided on 29th May, 1990.

1990 M L D 2049

SINDBAD TRAVELS (Pit.) LTD., LAHORE‑‑Petitioner Versus P.I.A. CORPORATION, LAHORE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore