Appellate Judgment
Appellate Judgment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Appellate Judgment Remarks about lower Court to be avoided as a rule. As a rule strong remarks about a lower Court must be avoided unless the judgment under appeal clearly discloses intellectual dishonesty or gross in competency on the part of the lower Court.
"Appellate Judgment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21519
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appellate Judgment"
2023 C L D 521
ANJUM SALEEM — Appellant Versus CITI BANK and another — Respondents
Court: Sindh2020 Y L R 226
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan and 6 others — Appellants Versus SAJIDULLAH and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief CourtP L D 1980 Peshawar 246
Malik RAHIM BAKHSH‑Appellant Versus Mst. MUNIRA AKHTAR‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ S. 14 read with S. 17 and Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 115---- Appellate judgment‑Revision‑Family Court though subordinate to High Court nevertheless its decision on appeal, held, cannot be said to be a case decided within meaning of S. 115, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 due to application of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 having been excluded by S. 17, Family Courts Act, 1964‑Appellate judgment of District Court under S. 14, Family Courts Act, 1964, hence, not open to revision to High Court.‑Revision (civil).2006 C L C 765
MUHAMMAD IQBAL and 3 others — Petitioners Versus ALLAH RAKHA and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2016 C L D 217
Messrs BROADTEX (PVT.) LTD. and 2 others — Appellants Versus Messrs NIB BANK LTD. — Respondent
Court: Sindh2019 M L D 1301
Raja MUMTAZ AHMAD KHAN — Appellant Versus Mst. FOZIA ISMAIL — Respondent
Court: High Court (AJ&K)2004 Y L R 1034
IFTIKHAR AHMED — Petitioner Versus HAKAM BIBI — Respondent
Court: Lahore2006 C L C 677
NAZAR MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2010 C L C 821
MUHAMMAD TAYYAB — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1984 S C M R 912
SHAMSHAD AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus MUKAMMIL SHAH AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ S. 11‑Res judicata‑Dispute over ownership of land‑Contention that question having already been decided in a suit and appellate judgment, same had become res judicata and could not be re‑opened in a fresh suit‑Only copy of appellate judgment which was by no means a speaking one, produced as proof‑No copy of pleadings of parties or judgment of trial Court furnished so that real nature of dispute in suit could be examined‑Person who was then recorded as owner of property was not party to suit‑No plea of res judicata had been taken before Courts below with result that parties were not put to issue on such plea‑No explanation furnished for not having taken plea all this time‑Such plea, therefore, could not be permitted to be raised before Supreme Court at leave granting stage‑Res judicata.