Home Maxims & Terms Constitutional Appeal meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Constitutional Appeal

Constitutional Appeal legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1950 PLD 9 BAGHDAD-UL-JADID Judicial Precedent
Constitutional Appeal Constitutional Appeal

Analogous to Letters Patent Appeal-Finding of fact cannot be disturbed, unless judge failed to consider evidence or admitted evidence which should not have been admitted.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Constitutional Appeal", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21531

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Constitutional Appeal"

PLD 1950
Civil Application for a. certificate to appeal to judicial Committee, decide on 26th November, 1949.

P L D 1950 Baghdad﷓ul﷓Jadid 1

GHULAM MUHAMMAD SHAH‑Petitioner Versus FATEH MUHAMMAD SHAH‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1975
Civil Appeals Nos. 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, 77 of 1968; 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, l0 of 1969 ; 9, 49 and 53 of 1970, decided on 26th November 1974.

1975 S C M R 91

THE PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE-Appellant Versus Mian NOOR AHMAD AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1992
Civil AppealNo.416 of 1986, decided on 29th April 1991.

1992 S C M R 1398

ASIF ALI KHAN and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1950
Civil Constitutional Appeal No. 11 of 1949, decided on 7th April 1949, against the order. of Ghulam Murtaza Shah, J.

P L D 1950 Baghdad﷓ul﷓Jadid 9

GHULAM MUHAMMAD SHAH‑Plaintiff‑Appellant Versus FATEH MUHAMMAD SHAH‑Defendant‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1954
J. P. S. L. A. No. 2 of 1954, decided on 15th March, 1954.

P L D 1954 Federal Court 240

ALI HAIDAR alias SHAMIM-Petitioner Versus THE CROWN-Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1983
Criminal Petition No. (?)-R of 1982, decided on 11th April, 1983.

1983 S C M R 542

SHAKOOR MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1974
Civil Appeal No. 92 of 1970, decided on 10th September 1974.

P L D 1974 Supreme Court 322

Mst. MURAD BEGUM ETc.‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ ETC.‑Respondents

Court:
YLR 2013
Election Appeal No.84 of 2013, decided on 16th April, 2013.

2013 Y L R 2666

BANK OF PUNJAB — Appellant Versus RETURNING OFFICER and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2022
2021-January-22

2022 P Cr

MUHAMMAD HANIF and 2 others — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
CLC 1980
Regular First Appeal .No. 6 of 1962/BWP and Civil Miscellaneous No. 948/S of 1964, decided on 24th April, 1979.

1980 C L C 775

GHULAM HUSSAIN SHAH-Petitioner Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD-Respondent

Court: -- Art. 58(2) read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 and Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 109 & 110-Certificate for leave to appeal to Supreme Court-Contention that though on enforcement of 1962 and 1973 Constitutions appeal in civil matters lay to Supreme Court only by special leave of Supreme Court and no appeal to such Court could lie under Ss. 109. & 110, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 yet applicant's appeal against dismissal of applica tion on ground of limitation having been allowed by Supreme Court and case having been remanded to i1igh Court, Supreme Court would have dismissed appeal on short ground of application having been otherwise incompetent notwithstanding question of limitation if indeed application were incompetent-Application having been remit ted by Supreme Court to High Court and not dismissed as incompetent, matter, held, involves substantial question of "aw as to interpreta tion of Constitution-Certificate of fitness of case for appeal to Supreme Court accordingly issued.--Appeal to Supreme Court Limitation.