Home Maxims & Terms Indian Republic meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Indian Republic

Indian Republic legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1951 PLD 13 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Indian Republic Decisions of the Courts of the Indian Republic are not binding on Pakistan Courts but that should not prevent one from referrifig to the legal principles enunciated by them.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Indian Republic", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21561

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Indian Republic"

PLD 1951
23rd February‑1951

P

A. K. R. AHMED and others‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF EAST BENGAL‑Opposite Party

Court: High Court
PTD 1963
Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 291 of 1958, decided on 28th October 1960.

1963 P T D 111

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI Versus LADY KANCHANBAI

Court: Madhya Pradesh India
PTD 1966
Writ Petitions Nos. 307 to 310 of 1955, decided on 10th April 1957.

1966 P T D 745

Before Rajagopalan and Rajagopala Ayyangar, JJ Versus INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE I,

Court: Madras (India)
PLD 1989
Civil Appeal No. 165 of 1982, decided on 21st February, 1989.

P L D 1989 Supreme Court 463

CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and another‑‑Appellants Versus Messrs KAGHAN IMPEX and another‑-Respondents

Court:
PLD 1963
Criminal Reference No. 449 of 1961, decided on 21st January 1963.

P L D 1963 (W

THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus EITEL FRITZ ANTON FORSTNER AND ANOTHER — Respondents

Court:
PLD 2004
N/A

P L D 2004 Supreme Court 875

MUHAMMAD SHAFI — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASGHAR and others — Respondents

Court: Per Rana Bhagwandas, J; Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan, J agreeing--Majority view
PLD 1959
Writ Petition No. 354 of 1959, decided on 1st July, 1959.

P L D 1959 (W

ZAFAR‑UL‑AHSAN‑ — Petitioner Versus THE REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN‑ — Respondent

Court: (c) Civil Service‑I. C. S. officer appointed by Secretary of State for India subsequently taken in Civil Service Pakistan‑Whe ther his service could not be terminated by, President of Pakistan--- Laws (Continuance in Force) Order, 1958 as amended by Laws (Continuance in Force) (Amendment) Orders IV of 1958 and I of 1959, Art. 6, read with cl. (3) of Art. 5.
PLD 1982
Writ Petition No. 3636 of 1981, decided on 21st March, 1982.

P L D 1982 Lahore 608

MESSRS KAGHAN IMPEX AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: S. 156 (9) read with Import Trade Regulation and Import Policy Orders, 1979‑1980 and Notification No. SRO‑1040(1)/80, dated 13‑10‑1980‑Contravention of Import Trade Regulations‑Legislative history of trade relations between Pakistan and India outlined‑No trade restrictions between India and Pakistan both on private as well as public sector existing before 1965 War‑Trade relations remaining suspended thereafter for about 10 years and resumed in 1975‑Position changed in Import Policy Order, 1976 and remaining unchanged under import Policy Orders of 1977 and 1978‑Para. 7 (5) of Import Policy Order, 1979 restricts import of goods from India (including goods of Indian origin) to public sector agencies‑No restriction placed under Para. 7 (1) for import of goods of Indian origin from any country other than India by private sector‑Government shown by history of import policy not to have totally banned trade relations between India and Pakistan in private sector in past‑Phraseology used in para. 7(5) of Import Policy Order, 1979, held, clearly shows import of goods whether or not of Indian origin having been restricted from India only and not goods of Indian origin through any other source.‑Interpretation of statutes.
MLD 1992
W. P. No. 3414 of 1992, decided on 16th May, 1992.

1992 M

M/s. NADIA GHEE MILL (PVT.) LIMITED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary Commerce,

Court: Lahore
PLD 2010
N/A

P L D 2010 Lahore 318

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Colonies, Punjab — Petitioner Versus Mst. WAZIRAN BIBI through Legal Heirs and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Land Reforms Regulations 1972 M.L.R.115---