Home Maxims & Terms Contempt meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Contempt

Contempt legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1986 SCMR 1062 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
O.XXVIIContemptPetitioner failing to deposit amount which was imperative before petition could be entertained by officeNeither amount deposited nor petitioner appearing on date fixed for considering petition on meritsDispute raised in proceedings not appropriate justiciable issue to be resolved by Court

Petition disposed as not entertain-able.

1984 PCRLJ 386 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Contempt

Tendency of Police Officers to flout order of Courts and then tender unqualified apology and beg for mercy to save their skins not approved-Indulgence and leniency shown by High Court, held, being misused by contemners- Serious view of matter to be taken by all concerned for effective administration of justice.[Sentence].

1963 PLD 170 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Contempt of Court

Pleadings-Contents of petition instituted in Supreme Court, published by newspapers-Scandalous nature of pleadings scandalising Judges of High Court-Contempt-Matter for High Court to consider-Publication, however, also interference with administration of justice by Supreme Court-Scandalising portions of petition later on deleted from petition at petitioner's request-Petition itself subsequently withdrawn-Publication leading to one-sided impression in mind of public-Contempt-Neither intention of printers or authors, nor truth or falsity of allegations of any consequence-Responsibility of newspapers to, safeguard due administration of justice-Publication of pleadings in advance-Serious interference with decision of case-Party to case (respondent), supplying copies of petition to newspapers-Guilt of party greater-Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 123 (2)-[The St. James'"Evening Post": Roach v. Garvan (Hall) (1742) 2 Atk. 469; Tichborne v. Mostyn 1868 L R 7 Eq. 55; In re: Cheltenham and Sw

1960 PLD 502 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Contempt

Proceedings can be taken against person guilty of commission of act which tends to bring administration of justice into scorn-Commissioner appointed under O. XXVI, C. P. C. not executing commission for one reason or other without such intention Not guilty of contempt.

1958 PLD 169 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Contempt Contempt-Proceedings against subordinate Courts fu, something having appearance of indiscipline-Not desirable.

1958 PLD 88 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

-Abuse of process of Court amounts to contempt-Police officer not carrying out Magistrate's order -for "immediate" medical examination of accused-Police officer applying for remand of accused on a false pretence-Contempt.

1953 PLD 244 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Contempt Committed by Advocate in India of Indian Court

Advocate on rolls also of 'Lahore High Court in Pakistan-Jurisdiction of Lahore High Court to act in the matter.

1953 PLD 188 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Contempt Jurisdiction of High Court to deal with, committed in grounds of appeal before Federal Court.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Contempt", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2160

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Contempt"

PLD 2024
N/A

P L D 2024 Lahore 109

Dr. MANZOOR HUSSAIN MALIK and another — Appellants Versus Mahar MUHAMMAD KHALID AHMAD, ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), BAHAWALPUR and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1980
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No Q-4 of 1979, decided on 12th May, 1980.

1980 S C M R 801

MUHAMMAD HASHAM KHAN-Petitioner Versus Malik BASHIR AHMAD-Respondent

Court: --Art.204---Contempt of Court-Incorrect details of certain facts in written statement-Does not always amount to contempt of Court Nothing in contempt application indicating any intention on respon dent's part to commit contempt-Contempt application, held, rightly dismissed.-Contempt of Court.
PCRLJ 2024
2024-February-22

2024 P Cr

Amjid Ali IHC — Petitioner Versus The State and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1974
5th September 1973

P L D 1974 Karachi 62

ABDUL JABBAR — ‑Applicant Versus Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 3 of 1973, decided on 5th September 1973.

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1990
1990-April-1

1990 P Cr

YAR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 2019
2018-August-9

2019 M L D 238

MIR AFZAL — Petitioner Versus MOHAMMAD FAREED and 14 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Abbottabad Bench)
PCRLJ 2004
2004-June-15

2004 P Cr

MUHAMMAD GULZAR — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HABIB and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1962
Criminal Original No. 18 of 1961, decided on 2nd January 1962.

P L D 1962 (W

THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL AZIZ‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 2000
Civil Revision No.932 of 1999, decided on 2nd September, 1999.

2000 C L C 387

SAID MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SULTAN AHMAD and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1980
1980-April-2

1980 P Cr

MIR ALAM KHAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: Peshawar