Home Maxims & Terms Commitment meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Commitment

Commitment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1958 PLD 24 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent

-Commitment-Joint trial of two or more accused-Jurisdiction of Magistrate ousted in case of one of them-Proper course is to commit both or all for trial before Court of Session-Joint trial of accused under Ss. 323 & 302, Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-All accused be committed to Court of Session-Discretion whether charge under S. 323, Penal Code (XLV of 1860) ought to be tried by Court of Session along with charge under S. 302, Penal Code (XLV of 1860) against other accused is judicial discretion to be exercised with care.

1951 PLD 228 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Commitment Order of, read in the presence of assessors by Sessions judge-Trial whether vitiated

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Commitment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21612

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Commitment"

PLD 1957
5th October 1956

P L D 1957 Supreme Court (Ind

SHYAM BEHARI‑Appellant Versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1971
Criminal Appeal No. 98 of 1970, decided on 31st May 1971.

P L D 1971 Supreme Court 694

QADAR BAKHSH AND 3 OTHERS-Appellants Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court:
PLD 1964
Criminal Reference ‑ No. 241 of 1963, decided on 6th December 1963.

P L D 1964 (W

THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM QADIR AND 2 OTHERS‑Accused‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1971
Criminal Reference No. 251 of 1969, decided on 11th Jan uary 1971.

P L D 1971 Peshawar 164

THE STATE‑ — Petitioner Versus HASHAM KHAN ETC.‑ — Respondents

Court:
PLD 1954
N/A

P L D 1954 Baghdad﷓ul﷓Jadid 30

KHERA and others‑Accused‑Petitioners Versus THE CROWN

Court: High Court
PLD 1963
Criminal Reference No. 132 of 1962, decided on 20th December 1962.

P L D 1963 (W

BAHADUR KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1964
Criminal Reference No. 90 of 1964, decided on 8th June 1964.

P L D 1964 (W

THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus SHER MUHAMMAD‑Accused‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1956
Criminal Revision Case No. 848 of 1956, decided on 31st January 1956, Case reported by Muhammad Rafiq, Sessions Judge Montgomery under section 438, Cr. P. C.

P L D 1956 (W

MUHAMMAD HANIF‑Petitioner Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1993
Criminal Petition No. 98(S) of 1992, decided on 20th October, 1992.

1993 S C M R 211

SHAKEEL AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1971
Criminal Revision No. 160 1971, decided on 15th February 1971.

P L D 1971 Lahore 732

ABDUL AZIZ‑ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — ‑Respondent

Court: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 220‑Commitment to Sessions Court‑Ball, cancellation of‑Murder case‑Magis trate not authorised to cancel ball not granted by himself or granted by superior Courts and giving him no option to cancel same on happening of certain events‑Accused committed to Court of Session to stand trial on murder charge‑Normally disen titled to remain on bail‑No option however, given to Magistrate by Sessions Judge while admitting accused to bail to cancel ball in event of commitment of accused to Sessions Court‑High Court, in circumstance, upheld Magistrate's order by cancelling bail itself.