Home Maxims & Terms Judicial notice meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Judicial notice

Judicial notice legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2025 PLD 145 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 112(2)Judicial noticeScopeCustom having force of law need not be proved separately in each case

Court may take judicial notice in accordance with Art. 112(2) of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984.

2025 PLD 110 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 112(2)Judicial noticeScopeCustom having force of law need not be proved separately in each case

Court may take judicial notice in accordance with Art. 112(2) of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984.

2025 CLC 439 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Judicial noticeConnotation

Term "judicial notice" means expression which has been recognized without proving of something as existing or being true.

2025 CLC 439 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Judicial noticeConnotation

Term "judicial notice" means expression which has been recognized without proving of something as existing or being true.

2023 MLD 51 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 112Judicial noticeScope

Judicial notice was used by a court when it declared a fact presented as true without a formal presentation of evidence i.e. allowing a fact to be introduced into evidence if the truth of that fact was so notorious/well known, or so authoritatively attested that it cannot reasonably be doubted.

2021 YLR 2245 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Art. 112(2)Judicial noticeMarket value, elevation ofCase of specific reliefEarnest money, premium uponEquitable jurisdiction of CourtMaxim: "He who seeks equity must do equity"ApplicabilityAppellant/buyer paid Rs. 2-Million as earnest money in 2004 which was acknowledged by the respondent / sellerSaid amount remained in use of the respondent for around 1½ decade approximately

Value of the Rupee depreciated after 2004 and today in 2021 the value of the same amount would surely be much folded higher

Principles of equitable administration of justice system are equally applicable upon all

Trial Court remained silent on the return of earnest money without any premium which was unfair/unjust on the touchstone of equitable principles

High Court (declaring Rs. 4-Million as returnable) directed the respondent to return, within a period of thirty days, an amount of Rs. 2-Million more in addition to the already returned earnest money i.e. Rs. 2-Million.

2009 PLD 879 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 164Judicial notice

Reports of the relevant period from the electronic and print media' had been taken into consideration by the Supreme Court, in forming the opinion generally as to the prevailing state of affairs having bearing on the issues involved in the matter

Parameters for the purpose of taking judicial notice of press reports detailed.

2009 MLD 911 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Recording of evidencePurposeKnowledge of JudgeJudicial noticeScope

By bringing evidence on particular issue, purpose of evidence of parties is that exact factual position as well as relevancy of connected material be brought to the knowledge of Court to enable it to pass an order

In certain situations Judge has his own knowledge in respect to facts or material which is connected with issue involved in case, e.g. environmental condition, pollution in country, poverty and increase in prices etc.

If knowledge of Court itself is beneficial towards decision of one issue then there is no restriction under law that such knowledge was not to be exercised.

1963 PLD 88 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Judicial notice

Taken of the fact that British nationals were not prevented from moving at time of Partition of India from one Dominion to the other Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 57.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Judicial notice", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21642

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Judicial notice"

MLD 1991
1991-June-29

1991 M L D 2016

SABRI MUMTAZ — Petitioner Versus KHALID ABDULLAH, S.P. CANTT., LAHORE

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2010
29th December 2009

2010 P Cr

MUHAMMAD MAKKI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1984
Writ Petition No. 487 of 1983, decided on 6th February, 1983.

1984 C L C 908

SAEED MUHAMMAD ‑Petitioner Versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT AND OTHERS‑ Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2015
Civil Appeal No.103 of 2012, decided on 22nd June, 2015.

2015 Y L R 2678

MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AZAD KHAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
MLD 2023
N/A

2023 M L D 51

Mst. SHARAINI BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1999
1999-March-19

1999 P Cr

MUKHTAR AHMAD and 3 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1987
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 528/B of 1986, decided on 1st December, 1986.

P L D 1987 Lahore 56

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑ S. 497‑Grant of bail‑Position as to exercise of discretionary powers in certain cases stated‑Grant of bail in some cases is a rule and withholding same an exception ‑‑ Increasing tendency for furnishing surety for accused on basis of forged documents‑Judiciary desired to take judicial notice and to curb such like evils through judicious exercise of discretion to avoid disastrous consequences for society and State.‑Administration of justice.
MLD 2000
Criminal Revision Application No.67 and Miscellaneous Application No. 1760 of 1999, decided on 26th November, 1999.

2000 M

AMJAD ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1980
Civil Appeal No. 8 of 1976, decided on 28th May, 1980.

P I

Present : Dorab Patel and Muhammad Haleem, JJ Versus Syed ZAMAN SHAH AND orxms-Respondents

Court: -- Ss. 15 & 18 read with Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 57-Privacy of house-Custom-Right of privacy of house-Burden lies on claimant to prove its existence-Right also to be specifically pleaded-Customary right of privacy of house-Necessary to investigate, before recognising such custom, whether essential attributes of custom exist, viz. if it is immemorial, reasonable, continued without interruption, certain in respect of its nature generally as well as in respect of locality and person alleged to be affected-Custom, held, acquires force of law only in such cases and judicial notice of custom also could be taken in like situation.-Custom-Burden of proof.
PCRLJ 1997
1995-April-4

1997 P Cr

Mst. MAQSOODAN BIBI — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court