Judicial notice
Judicial notice legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Court may take judicial notice in accordance with Art. 112(2) of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984.
Court may take judicial notice in accordance with Art. 112(2) of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984.
Term "judicial notice" means expression which has been recognized without proving of something as existing or being true.
Term "judicial notice" means expression which has been recognized without proving of something as existing or being true.
Judicial notice was used by a court when it declared a fact presented as true without a formal presentation of evidence i.e. allowing a fact to be introduced into evidence if the truth of that fact was so notorious/well known, or so authoritatively attested that it cannot reasonably be doubted.
Value of the Rupee depreciated after 2004 and today in 2021 the value of the same amount would surely be much folded higher
Principles of equitable administration of justice system are equally applicable upon all
Trial Court remained silent on the return of earnest money without any premium which was unfair/unjust on the touchstone of equitable principles
High Court (declaring Rs. 4-Million as returnable) directed the respondent to return, within a period of thirty days, an amount of Rs. 2-Million more in addition to the already returned earnest money i.e. Rs. 2-Million.
Reports of the relevant period from the electronic and print media' had been taken into consideration by the Supreme Court, in forming the opinion generally as to the prevailing state of affairs having bearing on the issues involved in the matter
Parameters for the purpose of taking judicial notice of press reports detailed.
By bringing evidence on particular issue, purpose of evidence of parties is that exact factual position as well as relevancy of connected material be brought to the knowledge of Court to enable it to pass an order
In certain situations Judge has his own knowledge in respect to facts or material which is connected with issue involved in case, e.g. environmental condition, pollution in country, poverty and increase in prices etc.
If knowledge of Court itself is beneficial towards decision of one issue then there is no restriction under law that such knowledge was not to be exercised.
Taken of the fact that British nationals were not prevented from moving at time of Partition of India from one Dominion to the other Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 57.
"Judicial notice", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21642
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Judicial notice"
1991 M L D 2016
SABRI MUMTAZ — Petitioner Versus KHALID ABDULLAH, S.P. CANTT., LAHORE
Court: Lahore2010 P Cr
MUHAMMAD MAKKI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1984 C L C 908
SAEED MUHAMMAD ‑Petitioner Versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT AND OTHERS‑ Respondents
Court: Lahore2015 Y L R 2678
MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AZAD KHAN and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court (AJ&K)2023 M L D 51
Mst. SHARAINI BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1999 P Cr
MUKHTAR AHMAD and 3 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1987 Lahore 56
MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ S. 497‑Grant of bail‑Position as to exercise of discretionary powers in certain cases stated‑Grant of bail in some cases is a rule and withholding same an exception ‑‑ Increasing tendency for furnishing surety for accused on basis of forged documents‑Judiciary desired to take judicial notice and to curb such like evils through judicious exercise of discretion to avoid disastrous consequences for society and State.‑Administration of justice.2000 M
AMJAD ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP I
Present : Dorab Patel and Muhammad Haleem, JJ Versus Syed ZAMAN SHAH AND orxms-Respondents
Court: -- Ss. 15 & 18 read with Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 57-Privacy of house-Custom-Right of privacy of house-Burden lies on claimant to prove its existence-Right also to be specifically pleaded-Customary right of privacy of house-Necessary to investigate, before recognising such custom, whether essential attributes of custom exist, viz. if it is immemorial, reasonable, continued without interruption, certain in respect of its nature generally as well as in respect of locality and person alleged to be affected-Custom, held, acquires force of law only in such cases and judicial notice of custom also could be taken in like situation.-Custom-Burden of proof.1997 P Cr
Mst. MAQSOODAN BIBI — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Federal Shariat Court