Home Maxims & Terms Pardanashin meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Pardanashin

Pardanashin legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 PLD 125 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Execution of document by pardanashin or old or illiterate ladyBurden of proof

Scope stated.

2011 PLD 23 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Illiterate person, old disabled, weak, ailing ignorant, inexperienced and unable to comprehend or conceive nature of business transaction

Sale by

Burden or proof

Care and caution to be taken in execution of sale-deed by such lady highlighted.

2011 PLD 208 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Transaction with pardanashin lady-Conditions for protecting the rights and interest of pardanashin lady

Pardanashin lady enjoyed certain protections under the law and the person who entered into any transaction with pardanashin lady, he must satisfy the conditions laid down under the law

If he would fail to fulfil the requirements, the transaction could not be deemed as reflected in the document

Certain conditions for protecting the rights and interest of pardanashin ladies were as to what was the origin of her intention to act in the manner, the document, was set out; as to whether the transaction was a natural disposition or unnatural one; as to whether the disposition took place in a natural, normal manner; as to whether she kept any part of the property for herself or transferred the whole; as to whether the transaction was righteous in character; as to whether she had any friendly advice before executing the deed and by a person whom the court considered as being genuinely interested in her welfare; as to whether she had benefited from the money raised by the transaction; as to whether the document was explained to her; as to whether she really had the capacity to understand its consequences; as to whether it was a mental act, i.e. whether the mind accompanied the hand that executed it; as to whether the contract or deed was just in itself; and that whether the entire transaction was free from circumstances throwing any shadow of doubt or suspicious on the inception, execution and application of the deed

Wherever a transaction was challenged by a pardanashin lady on grounds of fraud, collusion and misrepresentation, the beneficiary of the transaction was under legal duty to prove by producing overwhelming evidence to establish the genuineness of the sale transaction.

2011 CLC 796 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Pardanashin lady not accompanied and identified by any of her relative while executing sale-deedEffect

Such deed would become doubtful.

2010 YLR 3101 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Identification of an illiterate or Pardanasheen woman, vendor, must be established beyond doubt and court must be vigilant in taking extra care to ascertain the genuineness of a registered document which was alleged to have been executed by an illiterate or parda observing lady.

2010 YLR 3101 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Where the executant of a document was Pardanasheen or illiterate woman, notwithstanding the fact that she was known to the vendee or was a stranger to him, if she denied the execution of document, the party placing reliance on such document must prove its execution

Burden of proving the negative fact was shifted to such a woman, executant, if the initial burden of proving the genuineness of document was discharged.

2009 CLD 1346 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
EvidenceScope

Legal protection given to paradanashin or illiterate woman cannot be transmuted into legal disability.

2008 SCMR 1201 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Agreement to sell by illiterate Paradanashin ladyPlea of non-availability of independent advice to such ladyValidityAgreement was signed by her attorney/husband, who did not disown his signatures thereon during examination in CourtHusband admitted that he had brought his wife to the Court on relevant day

Marginal witness deposed that agreement was executed by such lady, which had been read over to her, who after accepting its correctness had put her thumb impression thereon

Lady, held, had executed the agreement in presence of her husband.

2006 YLR 1489 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Power of attorneySpecific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.42Power of attorney, execution ofAbsence of independent advice

Plaintiff assailed registered sale-deed on the ground that the power of attorney was executed by her without any independent advice, on the basis of which sale-deed was executed in favour of defendant

General power of attorney contained thumb-marks of plaintiff and her husband

Effect

Independent advice was available to plaintiff in circumstances.

2006 YLR 490 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Sale transaction by illiterate villager parda-observing lady having a young son and husbandDenial of sale by lady through suit and as witnessEffect

Onus would shift towards transferees to prove through independent positive evidence not only bargain between parties, but also transaction of sale and sale mutation by showing payment of sale consideration and transfer of possession thereunder

Principles illustrated.

2005 SCMR 941 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Execution of sale-deed by illiterate widowProof

Widow alleged that her thumb-mark on sale-deed was got by her brother on pretext that loan for tractor was to be obtained by him

Brother, to prove execution of sale-deed had produced son of scribe as witness, who stated that widow put thumb-mark thereon in his presence, but he did not state that the sale-deed was read over to her and she put thumb-mark thereon after understanding its contents and consequences flowing therefrom of depriving her of right of ownership in disputed land

Son of scribe did not state that payment of consideration or any part thereof was made in his presence

Payment of consideration was acknowledged in sale-deed to have been made prior to its execution

Another witness produced by brother stated that payment was made in his presence, but he did not state as to when, where and about how many days before execution of sale-deed, such payment was made

In view of such plea of widow, mere presence of her thumb-impressions on sale-deed would not be sufficient to prove execution thereof

Brother did not produce any witness from village to witness execution of sale-deed

Widow had minor children

None of near relatives of widow was made to join transaction and its settlement to prove that she had independent advice about what she was doing

Such evidence was necessary to prove execution of sale-deed by an illiterate Pardahnashin lady, where execution thereof was denied on ground of fraud

Onus to prove execution of sale-deed was on petitioner being beneficiary thereof

Execution of sale-deed held, was not proved in accordance with law.

2004 PLD 30 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts 117 & 120Burden of proofPardahnashin ladyPrinciple

Where Pardanashin lady is party to a suit, burden is on the male contestants to establish the ouster of Pardanashin lady from ownership or possession or any other right allegedly transferred to the male person.

2004 YLR 1034 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
MutationPardanashin lady, protection toObligations with regard to Pardanashin lady

Respondent, despite being an old, illiterate and Parda observing lady was not provided any independent advice before the sanctioning of mutation

Obligatory on the beneficiary to have made the lady understand things done in connection with attestation and sanctioning of mutation, with regard to her unawareness, age and non-exposure to public

Any transaction, in such circumstances, by a lady could not be maintained without strict proof.

2001 MLD 135 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Pardahnashin lady, privilege of

Where the lady had not taken the stand that she was illiterate, privilege of a lady being a "Pardahnashin lady" was not attracted.

1969 PLD 214 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Pardanashin -Execution of document-Step-son of one pardanashin and husband of the other writing out names of two pardanashin women on deed of agreement of sale of land

Verbal statement of other party to agreement that such women had given their consent not supported by other evidence

Document, held, was not binding on such pardanashin.

1961 PLD 140 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Pardanashin

Suit for cancellation of document executed by illiterate pardanashin on ground of fraud-Onus of proving genuineness of contents lies on party relying on document-Rule applies to poor, ignorant, illiterate woman though not pardanashin in strict sense.

1958 PLD 209 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Pardanashin Pardanashin-Plea of-To be raised in pleadings and should be made subject of an issue-Not to be entertained when raised in grounds of appeal only.

1958 PLD 399 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Pardanashin -Onus of establishing intelligent consent to transaction-How discharged-Women-folk in area of former Sind -Accustomed to leaving management of their property to men folk

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Pardanashin", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2166

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pardanashin"

PLD 2022
2022-May-10

P L D 2022 Supreme Court 504

ABDUL AZIZ — Petitioner Versus Mst. ZAIB-UN-NISSA and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2022
2021-November-26

P L D 2022 Supreme Court 99

MUHAMMAD NAEEM KHAN and another — Appellants Versus MUQADAS KHAN (decd) through L.Rs.and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1985
High Court Appeal No. 49 of 1976, decided on 14th February, 1985.

P L D 1985 Karachi 431

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN-Appellant Versus Mst. HAJRA BAI AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: by illiterate man or illiterate Pardanashin lady-Such persons who on account of their ignorance, inexperience and social conditions are not able to understand nature of business transaction, have been provided a cloak of protection-Onus in such cases is always on person who sakes advantages of a transaction to show that transaction was actually conceived and put into practice by disposer himself- Such onus how to be discharged.-Burden of proof.
YLR 2003
Civil Revision No.45 of 1997, decided on 3rd March, 2003.

2003 Y L R 1643

Mst. SHAMIM KAUSAR BUKHARI — Petitioner Versus Mst. Syeda KHIZRA SULTAN and 7 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 2025
2024-December-11

P L D 2025 Sindh 177

MUHAMMAD YASEEN — Appellant Versus SHAMSHAD ALI and 5 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2013
2013-April-18

2013 C L C 1813

Mst. ROZINA BEGUM — Petitioner Versus Nawabzada MUHAMMAD FATEH KHAN and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 1999
High Court Appeal No.3 of 1974, decided on 12th January, 1999.

1999 C L C 1057

RAZA HUSSAIN and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD KHAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 2025
2024-September-2

2025 C L C 1784

MUHAMMAD UMAR FAROOQ — Petitioner Versus IRSHAAD BIBI — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 1997
Civil Revision No. 428‑D of 1994, heard on 14th May, 1995.

1997CLC311

ABDUL QADIR and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ALLAH WASAYA and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1986
Suit No.740 of 1985, Civil Miscellaneous Application Nos. 4199 of 1984, 4201, 4506, 4202 of 1985 and 67 of 1986, decided on 7th May 1986.

1986 M L D 1262

HABIB BANK LIMITED‑‑Plaintiff Versus SHAHSONS FISHERIES LIMITED and 4 others Defendants

Court: Karachi