Home Maxims & Terms Mortgagor and Mortgagee in Possession meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Mortgagor and Mortgagee in Possession

Mortgagor and Mortgagee in Possession legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1952 PLD 600 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Mortgagor and Mortgagee in Possession

Mortgage amount left by mortgagor with mortgagee for payment to third party-Mortgagor not creditor of mortgagee, as mortgagee cannot be compelled to make payment, however mortgagee can be liable for damages

Such amount is not attachable in execution of decree.

1952 PLD 263 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Mortgagor and Mortgagee in Possession Mortgagor and mortgagee in possession-Suit between

Whether question of paramount title can be gone into-Whether mortgagee estopped from denying title of mortgagor.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Mortgagor and Mortgagee in Possession", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21661

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Mortgagor and Mortgagee in Possession"

PLD 1952
Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 699 pf 1946, decided on 27th July 1951, against the decree of A. S. M. Salek, Subordi nate Judge, 1st Court of Zilla Sylhet, dated the 17th September 1945, in Title Appeal No. 319 of 1945 affirming the decree of Muhammad Akbar Ameen, Munsif, 2nd Court, Habiganj, dated the 29th March 1945.

P L D 1952 Dacca 263

EROM CHAND BIBI and others‑Plaintiffs‑Appellants Versus ANNADA CHARAN RUDRAPAL and others

Court:
PLD 1989
Civil Revision No.28 of 1987, decided on 29th November,1988.

P L D 1989 Peshawar 107

CHAMAN KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus NAQIBULLAH KHAN and 10 others‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1973
8th September 1972

P L D 1973 Lahore 476

FAZAL AND 2 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB,

Court: High Court
MLD 1989
Civil Appeal No.2524 of 1985, decided on 1st December, 1987.

1989 M L D 1058

HANUMANT KUMAR TALESARA — Appellant Versus MOHAN LAL — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of India
PLD 1967
Second Appeal from Order No. 435 of 1964, decided on1st March 1967.

P L D 1967 Lahore 1000

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH-Appellant Versus ABDUL JABBAR-Respondent

Court:
PLD 1952
5th May 1950

P L D 1952 Lahore 600

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD‑Appellant Versus MULA SINGH and others‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1976
Letters Patent Appeal No. 928 of 1966 in R. S. A. No. 237 of 1958, heard on 12th November 1974.

P L D 1976 Lahore 647

Before Mushtaq Hussain and A. R. Sheikh, JJ Versus MARDANA (REPRESENTED BY 3 HEIRS) ‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 1991
R.OA. No.51 of 1989, decided on 3rd September, 1990.

1991CLC197

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN and 4 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus SIKANDAR KHAN and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Board of Revenue Punjab
CLC 1995
Writ Petition No. 168 of 1992, decided on 16th February, 1995.

1995 C L C 904

FAZAL‑UR‑REHMAN and 14 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, N: W.F.P. PESHAWAR and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1952
Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 481 of 1949, against the decree of B. Z. Ahmed, District Judge of Zilla Chittagong, dated the 30th November, 1948, in other Appeal No. 416 of 1947 modifying the decree of Maulvi Hedayat ullah, Subordinate Judge, 1st Court, Chittagong, dated the 18th September, 1947.

P L D 1952 Dacca 125

JAMINI RANJAN CHAKRAVARTY‑Appellant Versus KAMINI KUMAR SIL and others‑Respondents.

Court: