Contribution
Contribution legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Question raised by petitioner/industrial establishment was that in absence of specific wage limit by Governing Body, what could be the amount of minimum wage, on which Industrial establishment was liable to pay social security contribution
Held, payment on account of Social Security contribution was not to be less than the amount payable as remuneration under Minimum Wages Ordinance, 1961
In order to fix minimum wage of an employee, same criteria was to be fulfilled as given in Minimum Wages Ordinance, 1961
Minimum wage of an employee had to be the minimum wage as determined under Minimum Wages Ordinance, 1961 with regard to minimum wage fixed for unskilled employees
Establishments were under legal obligations to make their contributions as per the respective notification prevailing in the year concerned, in accordance with law
Even if there was no Governing Body to fix minimum wage, the minimum wage as already notified for respective year would be considered to be the minimum wage for making contributions by the establishments in accordance with law
Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.
S. 23 read with S. 20(4)-Contribution-Matter requiring re-examination as to contribution being charged in accordance with law
Absence of positive assertion on behalf of Institution regarding manner of calculation of contribution-Case remanded to Institution with direction to investigate into question whether contribution demanded by it calculated in accordance with provision of law governing subject, viz. S. 20 (4) of Ordinance.
Contribution Federal Court-Appeal-Whether High Court can grant certificate for, in, criminal matter-Federal Court Rules, O. XXII, O. XLIV, r. 6-Privy Council (Abolition of Jurisdiction Act, 1950, S. 3. Rule 6 of Order XLIV does not authorise the High Courts to grant a certificate to an intending appellant in a criminal case and thus confer powers on the High Court which it does not otherwise possess.
Suit for as between co-judgment-debtors towards costs-Not maintainable against a merely formal defendant in former suit.
"Contribution", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21662
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Contribution"
1999 P T D 2022
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus RAAB PIPE WORKS (P.) LTD.
Court: 226 I T R 7101989 P L C 993
SIND EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION Versus Messrs QUETTA TEXTILE MILLS LTD.
Court: Karachi High Court1999 P T D 1218
R. B. SHREERAM RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE TRUST Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Court: 233 I T R 531988 P L C 540
Messrs PLASTIC RAFTER LTD. Versus THE COMMISSIONER, SIND EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, KARACHI and another
Court: Karachi High Court1986 P T D 507
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, MADRAS Versus Shri BILLESWARA CHARITABLE TRUST, MADRAS
Court: Madras High Court (India)2016 P L C 44
IZHAR CONSTRUCTION (PRIVATE) LTD. through General Manager Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary and 6 others
Court: Lahore High Court1999 P T D 3068
KRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Court: 229 I T R 577SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN
INSTITUTION‑‑Appellant Versus DAWOOD COTTON MILLS LTD.‑‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑S. 2(3)‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)=‑Leave to appeal granted to examine whether Mill was not liable to make contribution in respect of employees who were covered by the definition of "employee" but the wages drawn by them exceeded Rs.20 per day. p. 4 A2017 P L C 199
PIONEER CEMENT LIMITED Versus The GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others
Court: Lahore High Court2012 S C M R 1428
FARID COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. and others — Appellant/Petitioner Versus VICE-COMMISSIONER, PESSI and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan