Home Maxims & Terms Set Of meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Set Of

Set Of legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1971 PTD 545 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Loss

Set-off - Speculation business-Loss in speculation whether can be set-of against other business profits of the same year-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 24(1), prov. (i) (after amendment in 1954), prov. (ii) (prior to amendment in 1954)-[Jagannath Mahadeo Prasad v. Commissioner of Incometax (1965) 55 I T R 501 and Gauri Dutt Bhagwan Das v. Commissioner of Income-tax (1965) 56 I T R 423 reversed.

1968 PTD 520 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 24(1) - Loss - Set-off -Continuation of business, necessary for claiming set-off of loss from total income-Functioning of Bank closed in pursuance of winding up order but income from property and interest on securities continuing to accrue Liquidation expenses incurred by defunct Bank, held, cannot be set-off against income accruing from properly and from interest on securities.

1964 PTD 496 ANDHRA-PRADESH-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Set Of -Principles-Set off against profits of any other business-Loss in speculative business-Whether can be set off against profits of other business-Speculative transaction-Test Scope of Expl. 2 to S. 24 (1)-Interpretation of Statutes-Taxing Acts-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 10, 24 (1), prov., Expl. 2.

1963 PTD 469 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Ss. 10 & 24 (1)-Loss-Set-off-Loss in foreign partnership-Whether can be set-off against profits of Indian business-Scope of Ss. 10 and 24.

1963 PTD 413 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

S. 24(2)-Loss-Set-off`-Same business'-Determination depends upon facts and circumstances of each case-Share of loss infirm where assessee has ceased to be partner-Set-off-Not admissible against share of profit from another firm.

1960 PTD 523 MADHYA-PRADESH-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Ss. 10 & 24 (1), first proviso

Business-Loss-Set off-Loss in speculation-Profits from other business-Interpretation of statutes operation of proviso to section.

1960 PTD 106 BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

S. 24 (2)-Loss-Set-off-Loss in speculation business-Profit in cloth business-Assessee whether entitled to set-off-Speculation business and cloth business whether "the same business."

1954 PLD 91 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Set Of Set-off (equitable)-Claimed by defendant way of damages-Whether Court-fees payable on amount claimed

Court Fees Act (II of 1872) Sch.1, Art. 1.

1952 PLD 41 SINDH-CHIEF-COURT Judicial Precedent
Set Of

Equitable-Whether not subject to Court-fees-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VIII. r. 6 and O. XX, r. 19 (3) ; Schedule IV-Court-fee Act (III of 1870)), S, 7 (1), Schedule 1, Art. 1.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Set Of", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21689

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Set Of"

PLD 1971
Criminal Reference No. 251 of 1969, decided on 11th Jan uary 1971.

P L D 1971 Peshawar 164

THE STATE‑ — Petitioner Versus HASHAM KHAN ETC.‑ — Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 2012
Writ Petition No.12783 of 2011, decided on 20th December, 2011.

2012 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT through Secretary Higher Education, Lahore and another

Court: Lahore High Court
YLR 2018
Civil Revision No.5 of 2008, decided on 5th October, 2015.

2018 Y L R 1531

ALL RESIDENTS OF MOUZA SIKSA, CHORBAT, TEHSIL KHAPLU, DISTRICT GHANCHE through Syed Mohammad Kazim and others — Petitioners Versus ALL RESIDENTS OF MOUZA PION, CHORBAT, TEHSIL KHAPLU, DISTRICT GHANCHE through Mohammad Ali and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
MLD 1989
Suit No. 684 of 1986, decided on 6th December, 1988.

1989 M L D 3569

WAZIR ALI — Plaintiff Versus THE PRESIDENT SERVICES INSTITUTE, P.A.F. BASE MASROOR and others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1981
Criminal Revision No. 34 of 1979, heard on 6th February, 1980.

1981 P Cr

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ AND 4 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1979
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 815 of 1975, decided on 26th November 1978.

1979 S C M R 154

MANZOOR ALIM ETC.‑Petitioners Versus Mst. GHULAM KUBRA ETC.‑Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1975
Criminal Appeal No. 65 of 1972, decided on 6th December 1974.

1975 S C M R 129

MUNIR AND 4 others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJN 2016
2014-May-9

2016 P Cr

KAMRAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2004
2004-September-2

2004 P Cr

ASGHAR — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 2010
2010-June-3

P L D 2010 Supreme Court 913

Mrs. AFROZ SHAH and others — Petitioners Versus SABIR QURESHI and others — Respondents

Court: High Court