Home Maxims & Terms Technical Defect in Criminal Trial meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Technical Defect in Criminal Trial

Technical Defect in Criminal Trial legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1954 PLD 104 FEDERAL-COURT-OF-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent

Technical Defect in Criminal Trial Technical defect in criminal trial-Amounting to illegality-Interference by Federal Court only when defect causes prejudice to accused or results in injustice-Defects of jurisdiction or constitution of Courts.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Technical Defect in Criminal Trial", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21707

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Technical Defect in Criminal Trial"

PLD 1954
Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1953, decided on 14th January 1954.

P L D 1954 Federal Court 104

MUHAMMAD SADIQ-Appellant Versus THE CROWN-Respondent

Court:
PLD 1988
Criminal Revision No.15 of 1986, decided on 1stFebruary, 1988.

P L D 1988 Peshawar 46

GUL MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus MULAZIM HUSSAIN and another — Respondents

Court: ---S.324--Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.4'39--Acquittal, revision against--Appellate Court while acquitting accused on account of defective trial and for deficiencies and certain omissions committee by Trial Court, altogether ignoring direct ocular evidence and arriving at conclusion that evidence of prosecution witnesses was not recorded in accordance with law--No finding arrived at by him that prosecution had been unable to establish its case--Order of acquittal set aside and case remanded to Trial Court to proceed with trial afresh in accordance with law--Held, when evidence of prosecution witnesses was not recorded in accordance with law, best course for Court of Session was to remand case back to trial Magistrate inviting his attention to various irregularities in conducting trial--Acquittal of accused without having least consideration to prosecution evidence just on technicalities was not the spirit of criminal practice.--Criminal trial.
PCRLJ 1975
Criminal Revision No. 449 of 1971, heard on 24th October 1973.

1975 P Cr

THB STATE‑Petitioner Versus JAHAN DAD‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1969
N/A

1969L3027

N/A

Court: High Court
SCMR 1987
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 483 of 1986, decided on 18th October, 1986.

1987 S C M R 167

ANWAR HUSSAIN and others Petitioners Versus FATEH ALI and others Respondents

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1993
1992-December-21

1993 P Cr

MUHAMMAD SADIQ BHUTTA — Petitioner Versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-CORRUPTION, PUNJAB,

Court: Lahore
MLD 2019
2018-July-26

2019 M L D 1101

Mst. HUMA JAMEEL — Applicant Versus Mst. RABIA TARIQ RIZVI and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLD 2011
2010-November-30

2011 C L D 408

SONERI BANK LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus CLASSIC DENIM MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED and 3 others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1997
1997-April-24

1997 P Cr

SULTAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
CLC 1988
Civil Revision No.108 of 1987, decided on 16th September,1987.

1988 C L C 65

GUL BARAN and 5 others‑‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL ZAHIR and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Quetta