Home Maxims & Terms Crown meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Crown

Crown legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1961 PLD 88 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Government-Whether liable for tortious acts of servants-English law Pakistan law.

1954 PLD 800 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Crown Crown-Action in tort against does not lie-Salary due for period before dismissal of Government servant however lies according to terms of employment.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Crown", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21730

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Crown"

PLD 1953
Privy Council Appeal No. 46 of 1961, decided on 12th May 1953, from the Supreme Court of Ceylon.

P L D 1953 Privy Council 58

THE ATTORNEY‑GENERAL OF CEYLON‑Appellant Versus A. D. SILVA‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1952
1952-January-21

P L D 1952 Privy Council 42

CANADA STEAMSHIP LINES LIMITED‑Appellant Versus THE KING‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1956
Privy Council Appeal No. 30 of 1954, decided on 25th July 1955, from the Supreme Court of Canada.

P IL D 1956 Privy Council 4

NISBET SHIPPING COMPANY LTD.-Appellant Versus THE QUEEN-Respondent

Court:
PLD 1950
Suits Nos. 210 and 486 of 1946, Application decided on 22nd October, 1947.

P

MUHAMMAD MEHDI and another‑Plaintiffs Versus GOVERNOR‑GENERAL‑IN‑COUNCIL and another — Defendants

Court:
SCMR 1994
Decided on 27th July, 1993.

1994 S C M R 1352

M‑‑‑Appellant Versus HOME OFFICE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: (1993) 3 W.L.R. 433
PLD 1963
Civil Appeal No. 71 of 1962, decided on 25th June 1963.

P L D 1963 Supreme Court 627

REHABILITATION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, RAWALPINDI)‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD YAQOOB BUTT AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1950
Criminal Revision No. 9 of 1950, decided on 6th May. 1950.

P

CROWN‑‑Complainant‑Petitioner Versus Syed MUHAMMAD HASSAN‑Surety‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1962
Civil Appeal No. 18 of 196,, decided on 27th November, 1961.

P L D 1962 Supreme Court 28

KARACHI‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD A. HAYAT‑Respondent

Court: (a) Writ‑---Mandamus or other writ‑Lies against Government Analogy from English law that mandamus does not lie against Crown, inapt‑Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Art. 170 ; Dicey's Law of the Constitution p. 527 of 1950 Edn. ; Phillip's Constitutional Law p. 447, 1957 Edn. ; Wade's Constitutional Law p. 317, 1957 Edn. ; Queen v. The Secretary of State for War (1891) 2 Q B 326 ; Rex v. Minister of Health (1930) 2 K B 98 ;Secretary of State v. Oberion (1923) A C 603 and Eshugbayi Eleko v. Officer Administering the Government of Nigeria and another A I R 1931 P C 248 ref..
SCMR 2018
Decided on 9th February, 2018.

2018 S C M R 924

CANADIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION — Appellant Versus HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Canada
PTD 2001
N/A

2001 P T D 1439

ADIL BEVERAGE COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. through Sheikh Muhammad Ashraf, Managing Director Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court