Franchise
Franchise legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
To infer a franchise under S. 2(12a) of Federal Excise Act, 2005 necessary ingredients are namely, (i) authority by franchiser, (ii) resultant right acquired by franchisee, (iii) franchised service or product, (iv) fee therefor and (v) identification of product or service with franchiser.
Assessee was aggrieved of order passed by Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue maintaining order of authorities and assessee was required to pay excise duty on services
Validity
Fee charged for technical services was not per se ground to infer a franchise, when neither S.2(12a) of Federal Excise Act, 2005, so prescribed nor was such a business reality
Name 'technical fee' or 'fee for technical assistance' were mere convenient labels and no more
When two companies charged technical fee for telecommunication network support activities to mobile companies, software companies charge technical fee for customized software deployed in networks, a maintenance and operations service provider charged technical fee to solar power projects, none of such were franchise relationships
Franchise as defined in S.2(12a) of Federal Excise Act, 2005 based on label given in a company's accounts to fee received for services was tantamount to rewriting S.2(12a) of Federal Excise Act, 2005, in its entirety
Television Channel in question was not a franchised service and was not caught by S.2(12a) of Federal Excise Act, 2005
Reference was allowed accordingly.
Franchise agreement allowed the franchisee the right to use the mark or patent of a franchisor for a royalty or fee and the franchisee must ensure that the goods or services maintained the uniformity and standard of the franchisor's goods or services
Franchisor provided technical assistance and know-how to protect its mark or patent so as to ensure uniformity in quality and therefore, a franchisor shared its business model with all relevant details so that the franchisee could use the patent, logo or mark of the franchisor and maintain the standard, style, quality and look of the product or services provided, as if it was given by the franchisor itself
Franchisor must grant the franchisee the right to use its patent or mark or logo, that was its intellectual property, to the extent necessary to operate the franchisee business
Franchisor also provided the assistance and know-how in support of the business and helped solve problems along the way.
Franchise Franchise-Women's-History.
"Franchise", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2176
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Franchise"
2026 P T D 173
HUB POWER COMPANY LIMITED Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT-VI)
Court: Islamabad High Court2023 P T D 102
PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION through Company Secretary Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT-V), LARGE TAXPAYERS OFFICE and 4 others
Court: Islamabad High CourtP L D 2003 Supreme Court 567
ARSHAD MAHMOOD and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Transport, Civil Secretariat, Lahore and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2016 P T D 1736
PUNJAB BEVERAGES CO. (PVT.) LTD. through General Manager Finance Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance and others
Court: Lahore High Court2016 P T D 1328
HONDA ATLAS CAR PAKISTAN LTD. Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Court: Lahore High Court2014 P T D (Trib
Messrs PAKISTAN BEVERAGE LTD., KARACHI Versus DCIR-09 AUDIT DIVISION-II, LTU
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal2016 M L D 349
LAHORE REGENCY (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus WYNDHAM HOTEL and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2016 C L D 606
LAHORE REGENCY (PRIVATE) LIMITED through Managing Director — Petitioner Versus WYNDHAM HOTEL through President and Managing Director and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2016 Y L R 304
LAHORE REGENCY (PVT.) LTD. — Appellant Versus WYNDHAM HOTEL and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2016 C L D 579
LAHORE REGENCY (PRIVATE) LTD. through Managing Director — Appellant Versus WYNDHAM HOTEL and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore