Bombay District Police Manual
Bombay District Police Manual legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Bombay District Police Manual -lnspectorGeneral of Police can enhance penalty Imposed by Superintendent of Police although no appeal has been preferred to him against order imposing penalty.
Bombay District Police Manual -Officer conducting inquiry relinquishing charge before recording finding-Punishing authority competent to appoint any other officer to conclude inquiry-Such other officer, however, can be considered "officer conducting inquiry" only if information about it has been conveyed to person against whom inquiry is being made.
Not applicable to persons recruited on temporary basis.
S. 243-Subordinate ranks of Sind Police Force-Dismissal or removal of persons holding temporary appointments-Procedure prescribed by Rule 1284, Bombay District Police Manual, Vol. 3, in relation to enquiry does not apply.
Ss. 240 and 243-Subordinate ranks of police-Conditions of service as prescribed by special Acts-Operation of S. 240, how far excluded-Bombay District Police Manual, Vol. 3, Rule 1284, sub-rule (12) and Sind Civil Service Rules, Rule 165-A read with Note (1) to Rule 33 of Bombay Civil Services (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules-Dismissal without inquiry, held, invalid.
"Bombay District Police Manual", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21798
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Bombay District Police Manual"
P L D 1962 (W
YUSUF KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE, KARACHI‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1955 Sind 200
NOORUL HASSAN‑ — Plaintiff Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — ‑Defendants
Court:P L D 1955 Sind 258
SULEMAN‑ — Plaintiff Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑ — Defendant
Court:1983 P Cr
ABDUL RASHID‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1962 (W
Syed TATHIR HUSSAIN‑Petitioner Versus THE ADMINISTRATOR, KARACHI AND ANOTHER — Respondents
Court:P L D 1958 (W
MUHAMMAD KHAN‑Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior,
Court: The petitioner who was a permanent Head Constable and had been acting as a Sub‑Inspector of Police in a "clear vacancy" for an indefinite period, was reverted to his previous post for "grave misconduct" and "ignorance of police working", without being afforded an opportunity to show -cause against the action proposed to be taken against him. The petitioner sought relief by a writ petition which was dismissed at the preliminary hearing. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court in Nurul‑Hasan v. The Federation of Pakistan P L D 1956 S C (Pak.) 331 declared that the provisions of Article 181 of the Constitution must prevail unless there was actual repugnancy in the particular law relating to the Police. The petitioner, thereupon, applied for a review of the order of summary dismissal of his petition.P L D 1955 Sind 11
SHER ZAMAN‑ — Plaintiff Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — ‑Defendant
Court:P L D 1955 Sind 250
KHADIM HUSSAIN‑ — Plaintiff Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — ‑ Defendants
Court:P L D 1955 Sind 285
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus NOORUL HASSAN‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1959 (W
Khan GHULAM HASAN KHAN‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN and others Respondents
Court: High Court