Home Maxims & Terms Estoppel, Plea of meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Estoppel, Plea of

Estoppel, Plea of legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

A legal defense that prevents a party from asserting a fact or claim that contradicts their previous statements, actions, or a judicial determination.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Estoppel, Plea of", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21816

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Estoppel, Plea of"

YLR 2003
Civil Revision No.295 of 1995, decided on 27th September, 2002.

2003 Y L R 95

GUL REHMAN and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Peshawar
MLD 1987
Civil Revision No.2141 of 1986, decided on 5th November, 1986.

1987 M L D 356

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and others — Petitioners Versus ASHIQ ALI and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1982
Writ Petition No. 7 of 1980, decided on 18th July, 1982.

1982 C L C 1720

SEERAT COMMITTEE, MUZAFFARABAD‑Petitioner Versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY

Court: Azad J & K
CLC 1986
Regular Second Appeal No. 149 of 1980, decided on 22nd October, 1985.

1986 C L C 1274

Mst. KALSOOM BEGUM‑‑Appellant Versus ABDUL QATTAR and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2007
N/A

P L D 2007 Lahore 485

AMJAD IKRAM — Petitioner Versus LAHORE CANTONMENT COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. Through Secretary and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1970
Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 717 of 1961, decided on 9th May 1969.

P L D 1970 Dacca 786

ABDUR RAHMAN BEPARY AND OTHERS Defendants Versus GULAPUDDIN BEPARY alias GUPALUDDIN BEPARI AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
MLD 1984
First Rent Appeal No.361 of 1981, decided on 28th October, 1934.

1984 M L D 1027

PAHLAJ RAI and 5 others — Appellants Versus Mst. MUMTIAZI BEGUM — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1976
10th December 1975

P L D 1976 Karachi 164

KHAIRPUR TEXTILE MILLS. LTD.‑Petitioners Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1988
First Rent Appeal No.433 of 1984, decided on 29th October, 1987.

1988 C L C 272

LITHOCRAFT CORPORATION‑‑Appellant Versus A. HABIB through his 9 Legal Heirs‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1985
Civil Appeal No. 53 of 1973, decided on 9th October, 1984

1985 S C M R 1701

MUHAMMAD JAMIL represented by his Legal Heirs — Appellant Versus AHMAD ZAMAN KHAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court