Decoy
Decoy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Decoy Decoy-Sending police officers to commit an offence in order to trap other offenders-Police officer committing such offence not protected from prosecution for same-Asking Magistrates to accompany police to witness such traps-Condemned.
"Decoy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21820
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Decoy"
P L D 1992 Lahore 45
ALLAH DITTA_~‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1954 Lahore 494
FIAFAZAT ALI SHAH‑Appellant Versus TAB STATE‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑--- S. 161‑Evidence Act (I of 1872), Ss. 133 & 114, illus. (b)‑Trap case‑Appraisal of evidence‑Complainant becomes a decoy witness and not accomplice in stricto senso‑Rule to seek corroboration of statement of such decoy witness was a sine qua non for conviction Provisions of S. 133 read with S. 114, illus. (b), Evidence Act, 1872 and theory of double test for appraisal of evidence would be strictly applicable for judging credibility of testimony of such witness Corroborative evidence did not necessarily mean, evidence ,through spoken words, but consisting of any such circumstance which tend to connect accused with crime.‑Witness.1990 S C M R 1199
MUHAMMAD NASIM AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: High Court1986 P Cr
ATTA MUHAMMAD‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2023 Y L R 564
MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR — Appellant Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore1989 M L D 4942
ABID ALI and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1986 P Cr
Raja BASHARAT ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1992 Supreme Court 254
~`s':R,,, MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: High Court1986 P Cr
SULTAN ALI‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑ — Respondent
Court: Lahore