Pith and Substance
Pith and Substance legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Words and Phrases Words and phrases-"Pith and substance"-Phrase used generally with reference to sub-constitutional laws but may be aptly used with reference to a constitutional provision which is not of the organic category.
"Pith and Substance", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2187
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pith and Substance"
P L D 2026 Federal Constitutional Court 29
ATTOCK CEMENT PAKISTAN LTD. — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN and another — Respondents
Court: Federal Constitutional CourtP L D 1947 Privy Council 1
PRAFULLA KUMAR MUKHERJEE and others Appellants Versus BANK OF COMMERCE LTD., KHULNA — Respondents
Court:P L D 1990 Quetta 1
USMAN LTD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT) CUSTOMS
Court: ‑‑‑Fourth Sched., Federal Legislative List, Part 1 & Art.199‑‑‑Finance Ordinance (XII of 1982), S.2 as amended by Finance Ordinance (XIV of 1983)‑‑‑Finance Act (I of 1985), S.5‑‑‑Vires of Finance Ordinance, 1982 and Finance Act, 1985 assailed on the ground of being beyond legislative competence of Federal Legislature‑‑‑Finance Ordinance, 1982 and Finance Act, 1985, were promulgated to secure "additional customs duty" which is undisputedly sanctioned by part I of the Federal Legislative List, attached to Fourth Schedule under the Constitution‑‑‑Both the legislations thus do not suffer from any infirmity, defect or incompetency.P L D 1970 Supreme Court 253
Syed GHULAM ALI SHAH-Appellant Versus THE STATE THROUGH A. D. M. AND TRIBUNAL, SANGHAR-Respondent
Court:1982 P T D 281
REX CINEMA, BUREWALA Versus MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, BUREWALA AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court Lahore1997 M L D 3248
AAMIL MOIN FAROOQUI‑‑‑Appellant Versus Mst. AASIA KHALID and another ‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1993 S C M R 1304
Master MUSA KHAN and 3 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ABDUL HAQUE and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1997 Karachi 604
Mian EJAZ SHAFI and others‑‑‑ Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑S. 18‑B‑ ‑"Service charges ‑‑Meanings ‑Words and phrases2018 C L D 1088
SHAFIQUDDIN MOINEE — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Islamabad and 2 others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 1947 Privy Council 12
BANK OF COMMERCE, LTD. KHULNA Appellant Versus AMULYA KRISHNA BASU ROY CHOWDIIURY and others-Respondents
Court: