Home Maxims & Terms Husband and Wife meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Husband and Wife

Husband and Wife legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 PLD 1 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Husband and wifeIndividual ownership of propertyDoctrine of proximityApplicability

Separation of entities of the spouses regarding the holding of separate properties by them individually was clearly ordained in the Holy Quran

Islam stipulated separate identities of the spouses particularly in relation to their entitlement for holding of their properties separately from one another

Doctrine of proximity did not apply to the properties of spouses.

1964 PLD 442 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Husband and Wife Maintenance

Quantwn - Income of father Rs. 500-Amount of Rs.100, held not such as he cannot afford to spend on two minor daughters but hardly enough for their food and clothing-Husband's prayer for reduction in amount of maintenance declined-Criminal Procedure Code (V of 188), S. 488.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Husband and Wife", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21871

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Husband and Wife"

CLC 1986
First Rent Appeal No. 380 of 1982, decided on 10th September, 1985.

1986 C L C 720

Dr. SALMA NASSIR‑‑Appellant Versus ZAITOON KHATOON and 5 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1957
Privy Council Appeal No. 9 of 1956, decided on 4th December 1956, from the Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa.

P L D 1957 Privy Council 92

LAILA JHINA MAWJI and another‑Appellants Versus THE QUEEN‑Respondent

Court: Criminal conspiracy‑-------Between husband and wife only Whether indictable under law of Tanganyika (East Africa) Rule of English Law‑‑Pakistan Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 120‑A‑Evidence Act (I of 1872). S. 122.
MLD 1986
Constitutional Petition No.S‑19 of 1986, decided on 13th April 1986.

1986 M L D 991

Syeda SHAMS ZEHRA NAQVI‑‑Petitioner Versus Miss SOOFIA LATEEF and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1989
Civil Appeal No.19 of 1987, decided on 5th October, 1988.

1989 C L C 3

REHMATULLAH‑‑Appellant Versus Mst. SHAMIM AKHTAR‑‑Respondent

Court: Azad J & K
PLD 2013
2012-December-12

P L D 2013 Federal Shariat Court 18

Professor KAZIM HUSSAIN and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and

Court: High Court
PLD 2010
2009-October-21

P L D 2010 Supreme Court 569

GHULAM MURTAZA — Appellant Versus Mst. ASIA BIBI and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2023
2022-August-29

2023 C L C 838

Mst. SHAHIDA PARVEEN through Legal Heirs and others — Appellants Versus SAEED AHMED and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PLC(CS) 2013
Shariat Petitions Nos.8/I of 2004 linked with 6/I, 8/I, 12/I and 69/I of 1994, decided on 12th December, 2012.

2013 P L C (C

Professor KAZIM HUSSAIN and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and others

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PLD 1988
Constitutional Petition No.S‑54 of 1988, decided on 21st August, 1988.

P L D 1984 Karachi 625

MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. RUKHSANA BEGUM and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑Valid retirement of husband and wife‑‑Meaning and connotation‑ Presumption of consummation of marriage‑‑Validity of.‑‑Words and phrases.
CLC 2001
Constitutional Petition No.S‑355 and Miscellaneous Application No.611 of 2000, decided on 15th February, 2001.

2001 C L C 1328

ABDUL FATEH BABAR SANI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. NAUREEN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi