Home Maxims & Terms Jagir meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Jagir

Jagir legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1964 PLD 756 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Registration of Claims (Displaced Persons) Act (111 of 1956), Ss. 2 & 5-Claim in respect of agricultural land Grant of land (Jagir) from State or Indian Ruler-Not property within meaning of S. 2 (2) - Claim respecting such land Not entertain-able under Sch. V of Form prescribed for filing of claim - Central Government Notification dated 7-4-58 and subsequent Notification dated 2-10-59-Directions by Claims Commissioner (vide letter No. Jagirs/59/13616 dated 10-9-59) that claims under Sch. V-A in respect of Jagir land with proprietary rights be transferred to Sch. V and verified as such-Held, not valid.

1958 PLD 175 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Jagir -Nature of-Grant whether of soil or only of revenueTo be determined in each case from terms of grant

No presumption that Jagirs in Sind resemble those in Bombay Presidency.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Jagir", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21881

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Jagir"

PTD 1972
Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 179 of 1965, decided on 17th September 1968.

1972 P T D 412

LATE NAWABZADA RASHIDUZZAFAR KHAN (REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL HEIR) Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, M. P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh (India)
CLC 1979
28th

1979 C L C 195

Sardar MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN-Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN-Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1967
Writ Petition No. 666 of 1958, decided on 24th June 1966.

P L D 1967 Lahore 533

Nawabzada Malik HABIB ULLAR KHAN TIWANA AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus THE PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER- Respondents

Court:
SCMR 2007
Civil Appeal No.1030 of 1999, decided on 3rd April, 2007.

2007 SCMR 1212

Mst. HAZAN and 48 others — Appellants Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN and 383 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1987
Revision Application No.97 of 1981, 'decided on 8th September, 1987.

1987 M L D 2856

Mir GHULAM ABBAS and 4 others — Applicants Versus Mst. SARAN and 13 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1958
Writ Petition No. 168 of 1955, decided on 12th December 1957,

P L D 1958 (W

Mir ABDUL HUSAIN KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN‑‑Respondent

Court: Secretary of State for India v. Laxrnibai 25 B L R 527 (P C); Seth Trikamdas v. Seth Thawardas 1 Selected Decisions (Sind Sadar Court) 89; Mr. Jam Khan v. Lekhraj 2 Selected Decisions (Sind Sadar Court) 41 ; Mir Shar Muhammad v. Jethomal 14 S L R 1 and Pir Makhdum and others v. Malik Boola Khan A I R 1921 Sind 109 ref.
PLD 1997
1996-December-23

P L D 1997 Quetta 104

Mst. HAZAN and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, BOARD OF REVENUE,

Court: (e) West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 M.L.R.64‑‑‑
PLD 1973
Civil Appeals Nos. 109 of 1966. 4, 6, 9, 16, 24, 42, 51, 54, 68, 69, 70, 71 of 1967 and 8 of 1968, decided on 19th March 1973.

P L D 1973 Supreme Court 236

Nawab Syed RAUNAQ ALI ETC.‑Appellants Versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1973
Writ Petition No. 1531 of 1965, decided on 3rd May 1971.

P L D 1973 Lahore 264

SHAMIR AND 83 OTHERS ‑Petitioners Versus THE CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1981
Civil Appeal No. K‑21 of 1975, decided on 22nd August 1979.

1981S45

Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ. Versus Mir AIJAZ ALI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: 0. XU, r. 23‑Remand (civil)‑Suit contested by parties on basis of appellants funding their rights on Jagir‑Single Bench at an earlier stage of appeal in case coming to conclusion regarding trial of an additional issue on Jagir being necessary and remanding case for further proceedings with consent of both parties and re‑submission to High Court‑Impugned judgment giving impression of orders of remand in appeal being subject of same appeal‑Order of remand, held, could not be criticised by Judge finally deciding appeal. Remand of case.