Expungement of Remarks
Expungement of Remarks legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Expungement of Remarks Expungement of remarks-Magistrate not to make disparaging remarks against person neither party nor witness in case-Unwarranted condemnatory remarks without giving opportunity to explain against principle of natural justice.
Expungement of Remarks -Objectionable remarks in judgment against person not party nor witness in criminal case-Remarks amounting to finding-Held, Court was at liberty to examine person concerned but not to condemn unheated-Remarks expunged.
Power of Revenue Board-Quarae. Quarae : Whether Revenue Courts have powers of expungement enjoyed by Civil Courts.
"Expungement of Remarks", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21886
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Expungement of Remarks"
P L D 1957 (W
Sh. INAYAT ULLAH BUTT‑Petitioner Versus CANTONMENT BOARD RAWALPINDI and another‑ Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1996 Karachi 388
J.M. HAYAT QURESHI ‑‑‑ Applicant Versus THE STATE ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑‑ S. 561‑A ‑‑‑ Expunging of remarks ‑‑‑ Adverse remarks had been passed by High Court against the applicant Advocate when he, while appearing on behalf of the Advocate‑General in a bail application, had raised no objection to the grant of bail to the accused therein ‑‑‑ Record not showing that applicant was called upon to elaborate and explain the reasons for his not objecting to bail application of accused and still he failed to do so ‑‑‑ Orders were passed later on in the chambers and the case of applicant was that‑he learnt thereafter that he was required to give his reasons for his no objection ‑‑‑ Prosecution under the circumstances had no objection if the remarks damaging to the applicant were expunged from the order‑‑‑ Adverse remarks passed in the said order against the applicant were expunged accordingly. ‑‑Expunction of remarks.1991 P Cr
Dr. MAHBOOB ALI SOONIRO — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1963 (W
ALI DINO MIRZA, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DADU‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:1986 P Cr
Sheikh RIAZ‑UD‑DIN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
Court: Lahore2002 Y L R 3697
Mirza MUHAMMAD IQBAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus STATE through Advocate‑General, Punjab, Lahore and 3 others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1969 S C M R 145
MUHAMMAD SAEED QURESHI, KARACHI Petitioner Versus Mst. IFFAT ARA‑Respondent
Court: High Court1975 P Cr
Ch. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1985K65
Before Abdul Razzak A. Thahim, J Versus MUHAMMAD YOUSIF ZAMAN AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents
Court:1986 P L C (C
ABDUL MATLOOB KHAN. Versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, S.G.A. & I DEPARTMENT and another
Court: Service Tribunal Punjab