Mule-Breeding Grant
Mule-Breeding Grant legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Direction contained in letter issued by Government in February 1952 is not inconsistent with discretion contained in clause 25 of 1942 Statement -Duty of Collector, stated.
To be ordinarily decided on recommendation of District Remount Officer-Rule of primogeniture not applicable.
"Mule-Breeding Grant", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21889
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Mule-Breeding Grant"
P L D 1959 W
KHATUN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others‑Respondents
Court:P L D (Rev
MUHAMMAD ALI *SHAH‑Petitioner Versus FIDDA HUSSAIN SHAH‑Respondent
Court:2005 C L C 1590
BASHIR AHMAD and others — Petitioners Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (COLONIES), and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1976 Supreme Court 435
Sub. MUHAMMAD ASGHAR‑Appellant Versus Mst. SAFIA BEGUM AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ S. 10(3) and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 98‑Allotment of horse/mule breeding grant‑Writ jurisdiction‑Collector, subject to control of Board of Revenue‑Vested with descretion to allot remount breeding tenancy‑High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Art. 98 ‑‑ Not justified in interfering with discharge of functions entrusted to Collector under law‑Court or tribunal, having jurisdic tion, determining a question‑Cannot be said to have acted illegally or with material irregularity merely for reason of having come to an erroneous decision on a question of fact or even of law‑Constitutional provision of Art. 98‑Not designed to empower High Court to inter fere with decision of Court or tribunal of inferior jurisdiction merely because of decision being wrong in its opinion.‑Writ.1995 C L C 408
ABDUL LATIF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PUNJAB PROVINCE and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1993 M L D 1905
BAKHSH — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector,
Court: Lahore1995 C L C 838
MUNIR AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SECRETARY (COLONIES), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1973 Lahore 726
SAVA BEGUM‑Petitioner Versus THE BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑‑Respondents
Court:2000 M L D 1097
MANZOOR‑AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ZAFAR IQBAL and others‑‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2011 Y L R 3079
QAMAR-UZ-ZAMAN-Petitioner Versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB (JUDICIAL-IV) and 3 others —
Court: Lahore