Home Maxims & Terms Agricultural Income-tax meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Agricultural Income-tax

Agricultural Income-tax legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 PTD 2130 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income or capitalSales of unyielding rubber treesAgreement specifying part of consideration towards value of latexPart of consideration for latex is income and part for fuel value is capitalAgreement not bifurcating considerationNo recital or factor indicating that latex was presentNo presumption for similar bifurcation permissibleEnter consideration capital in. nature

Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955.

1972 PTD 540 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-tax

Agricultural income-tax - Hindu undivided family-Claim for partition-No assessment earlier as Hindu undivided family-Assessment on family

Whether valid

Madras Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955, S. 29(1).

1972 PTD 389 KERALA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-taxAgricultural Income-tax

Capital or revenue receipt and expenditure-Trees planted for sale-Sale proceeds Whether revenue receipt-Expenses of planting and maintenance Whether revenue expenditure-Whether expenses should be incurred in previous year-allowance of expenses of prior years in certain ventures ventures Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, S. 5.

1971 PTD 617 KERALA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-tax

Deductions-Tea estate-Houses owned by assessee occupied by employees-Some paying rent-Whether depreciation and repair charges for all the houses allowable -Agricultural Income-tax Act (Kerala), 1950, Ss. S(d), (j) & 12.

1969 PTD 508 MYSORE-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Agricultural Income-tax

Process ordinarily employed by the cultivator Meaning and tests Tamarind Process employed for removing fibre and seeds Indian Income tax Act, 1922, S. 2 (1) (b) (ii).

1968 PTD 334 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Agricultural Income-tax Agricultural Income-tax-Legislative powers-State Legislature-Income from tea plantations-Scope of legislative power

Provision disentitling deduction of expenditure in the upkeep or maintenance of immature plants from which no income derived during previous year-Whether applies to computation of income from tea plantations-Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, S. 5, Expl. 2

Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 10(2)(xv) & 59-Indian Income-tax Rules, 1922, rr. 23 & 24

Constitution of India, Sch. VII, List II, entry 46.

1968 PTD 302 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Agricultural Income-tax Agriculture Income-tax-Legislative powers-State Legislature Provision disentitling deduction of expenditure incurred in the cultivation, upkeep or maintenance of immature plants from which no income is derived during the previous year-Competency-Provision whether discriminatory-"Income", meaning of

Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, S. 5, Explanation 2-Constitution of India, Art. 14 ; Sch. VII, List I, entry 82 ; List II, entry 46.

1968 PTD 944 KERALA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Agricultural Income-tax Agricultural income-Lands granted as tax free-Subsequent imposition of quit rent and royalty cess - Whether land "assessed to land revenue"

Income, whether agricultural

Travancore-Cochin Income-tax Act, 1950; S. 2(a)-Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 2(1).

1968 PTD 844 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Agricultural Income-tax Agricultural income-Bidi manufacture-Pollarding and coppicing of tendu shrubs-Whether agricultural operation-Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 2(1).

1965 PTD 817 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Agricultural Income-tax Agricultural income-Jagirdar divested of interest in land

One-fourth of net revenue collections given in perpetuity by way of pension-Whether agricultural income-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 2(1)(a)-[Kunwar Trivikram Narain Singh v. Commissioner of Income-tax (1961) 41 I T R 150 reversed].

1965 PTD 808 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Agricultural Income-tax Agricultural income-tax-Assessment by Additional Collector

Set aside as without jurisdiction-Subsequent amendment of statute with retrospective effect-Review-Effect of cancellation of order setting aside assessment-Limitation-U. P. Agricultural Income tax Act, 1948, S. 2 (4-a)-U. P. Agricultural Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1956, Ss. 2 & 11.

1965 PTD 400 ANDHRA-PRADESH-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Agricultural Income-tax Agricultural Income-Recovery of tax-Assessment under Hyderabad Agricultural Income-tax Act-Repeal of Act-Recovery of taxes whether permissible-Issue of demand notice in 1955

Recovery in 1961 whether time-barred-Hyderabad General Clauses Act, 1308-F., S. 3-Hyderabad Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, S.34(5).

1964 PLD 102 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Agricultural Income-tax Gift-Donor, in statement before Revenue Officer, binding himself for payment of tax for gifted property, and mutation attested on that understanding-Held (by Full Board) that donor continues to be liable for agricultural income-tax for all times-Subsequent statement by him resiling from previous commitment does not alter position.

1962 PLD 35 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent
Agricultural Income-tax -Bona fides of transaction-Rests on Collector's opinion-Not a question of judicial discretion

Collector accepting a transaction as having been entered into bona fides-Order not to take effect retrospectively.

1959 PLD 14 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Agricultural Income-tax Legal owner is to be taxed according to law.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Agricultural Income-tax", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21922

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Agricultural Income-tax"

CLC 2013
2013-April-24

2013 C L C 1481

NADEEM SARWAR — Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Election Commissioner, Punjab and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 1968
Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 1316 of 1962, decided on 19th December 1966.

1968 P T D 253

PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus PROMODE CHANDRA MAZUMDAR‑Plaintiff‑Respondent.

Court: Dacca Pakistan
PTD 2019
Civil Appeals Nos. 815 to 855, 860 to 974, 1476 to 1487, 1601 to 1743, 1883 to 2015, 2089 to 2105 and 2204 to 2287 of 2016, Civil Petitions Nos. 2991-L, 2992-L, 2996-L, 3013-L to 3016-L, 2997-L, 3017-L, 3018-L, 3020-L, 3026-L to 3029-L, 3041-L to 3049-L, 3112-L, 3171-L to 3179-L of 2016, 823-L to 827-L, 918-L, 956-L to 958-L, 991-L to 994-L and 1032-L to 1034-L of 2017, Civil Misc. Applications Nos.382-L to 537-L, 1067-L to 1077-L and 1079-L of 2016, decided on 8th January, 2019.

2019 P T D 826

MEMBER (TAXES) BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE and others Versus QAISAR ABBAS and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2019
Civil Appeals Nos. 815 to 855, 860 to 974, 1476 to 1487, 1601 to 1743, 1883 to 2015, 2089 to 2105 and 2204 to 2287 of 2016, Civil Petitions Nos. 2991-L, 2992-L, 2996-L, 3013-L to 3016-L, 2997-L, 3017-L, 3018-L, 3020-L, 3026-L to 3029-L, 3041-L to 3049-L, 3112-L, 3171-L to 3179-L of 2016, 823-L to 827-L, 918-L, 956-L to 958-L, 991-L to 994-L and 1032-L to 1034-L of 2017, Civil Misc. Applications Nos.382-L to 537-L, 1067-L to 1077-L and 1079-L of 2016, decided on 8th January, 2019.

2019 S C M R 446

MEMBER (TAXES) BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE and others — Appellants/Petitioners Versus QAISAR ABBAS and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2026
I.T.A. No.623/IB of 2024, decided on 25th September, 2024.

2026 P T D (Trib

QAISER AZEEM Versus The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RANGE-I, ZONE SOUTH, RTO, ISLAMABAD

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
PTD 1964
Agricultural Income‑tax Reference No. 1 of 1961, decided on 3rd April 1963.

1964 P T D 310

S. K. DUTTA Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME‑TAX, ASSAM

Court: Assam (India)
PTD 1997
Civil Appeal No.9168 of 1996, decided on 15th July, 1996.

1997 P T D 1390

POOTHUNDU PLANTATIONS (PVT.) LTD. Versus AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX OFFICER and others

Court: 221 I T R 557
PTD 2015
ROR No.223 of 2014, decided on 29th October, 2014.

2015 P T D 2292

Mst. SANA HUSNAIN Versus The STATE

Court: Board of Revenue Punjab
PTD 1964
Whether a particular item of expenditure is "laid out or expended for the cultivation, upkeep or maintenance of immature plants" is essentially a question of fact and cannot be decided on any general principle of law. All that can be said is that the connection between the item of expenditure and the cultivation, upkeep or maintenance of immature plants must be definite and real, and not vague or illusory.

1964 P T D 764

COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME‑TAX, KERALA Versus JOHNSONS ESTATES AND AGENCIES (PRIVATE) LTD.

Court: Kerala (India)
PTD 1968
Petitions Nos. 234 to 236 of 1961, decided on 1st November 1962.

1968 P T D 334

KARIMTHARUVI TEA ESTATES LTD. AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OE KERALA AND OTHERS

Court: Supreme Court India