Personal Liberty
Personal Liberty legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Statute imposing restrictions on Provisions must be strictly complied with-Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 7.
"Personal Liberty", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21941
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Personal Liberty"
P L D 2018 Lahore 758
Mst. SAFIA BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2015 Islamabad 30
Malik MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE — Petitioner Versus Mst. TANVEER JAHAN and another — Respondents
Court: High Court1999 Y L R 2635
STATE through Advocate‑General, N.‑W.F.P., Peshawar‑‑‑Applicant Versus AKHTAR MUNIR‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Peshawar1999 Y L R 315
GULAB — Petitioner Versus SHAH GUL and 5 others — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 2017 Lahore 604
Mst. RUBINA KAUSAR — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1969 Lahore 908
Syed ABUAL A ALA MAUDUDI‑Petitioner Versus (2) THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTPAKISTAN OF PAKISTAN‑ Respondents
Court: (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 6, Fundamental Right No. 5‑Object‑Freedom of movement‑Whether right of freedom to move freely throughout country embodies within it, as a compo nent part thereof, the right to step out of, or into, Pakistan (Quaere)‑Per Muhammad Akram, J..2026 P Cr
Ali Asghar and 2 others — Appellants Versus The State and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)P L D 1997 Lahore 617
WAJID SHAMAS‑UL‑HASSAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary,
Court:P L D 1997 Lahore 680
MUHAMMAD RIAZ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OKARA and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑S. 9‑‑‑West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), S.82‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑Maxim: "Nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa"‑‑‑Applicability‑‑‑Recovery of maintenance as arrears of land revenue in execution of decree‑‑‑Applicability of maxim "Nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa" (No man shall be twice vexed for one and the same cause)‑‑ Extent‑‑‑For recovery of maintenance as arrears of land revenue, any defaulter who had once served out maximum period of civil imprisonment was not liable to be again incarcerated under provision of S.82, West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967‑‑‑Maxim "Nerno debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa" was fully attracted to such case‑‑‑Defaulter, however, could not be absolved of his liability to pay maintenance‑‑‑Amount of maintenance was recoverable by all other lawful methods‑‑‑Warrants for arrest and detention of petitioner issued by respondent (official) were declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect.‑‑Maxim.P L D 2024 Lahore 715
KANEEZ FATIMA and another — Petitioners Versus SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE (FAMILY DIVISION) and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court