Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Purchase meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Purchase

Purchase legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1957 PLD 219 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent

Purchase "Sale"-"Purchase"- Words applicable to transactions by which transfer of ownership in land takes place as a result' of compulsory acquisition-"Disposition".

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Purchase", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21993

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Purchase"

PLC(CS) 2004
Appeal No.663 of 2003, decided on 2nd October, 2003.

2004 P L C (C

Dr. AZHAR IQBAL Versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and another

Court: Punjab Service Tribunal
PTD 1992
Income-tax References Nos. 447 of 1977 and 295 of 1978, decided on 25th April, 1991.

1992 P T D 1485

INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: Bombay High Court (India)
PTD 1996
I.T.As. Nos.5128/KB of 1991-92, 1793/KB and 2238/KB of 1994-95, decided on 4th February 1996

1996 PTD (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
CLC 1986
Civil Revision No. 49 of 1978, decided on 5th November, 1985.

1986 C L C 566

Forest Department, Peshawar and 4 others‑‑Petitioners Versus Firm RAJA MUHAMMAD FEROZ‑UD‑DIN SONS‑‑Respondent

Court: Peshawar
MLD 2004
Execution No.42 of 1999, decided on 1st January, 2003.

2004 M L D 319

Messrs UNITED BANK LTD. ‑‑‑Applicant Versus Messrs NEPHEW AND NEPHEW LTD. CO. ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1984
Second Appeal No. 137 of 1974, decided on 22nd January, 1984.

1984K35

Before Ally Madad Shah, J Versus MUHAMMAD MUNAWAR‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑ O. XX, r. 14‑Pre‑emption‑Purchase money not deposited in Court during pendency of suit nor trial Court specifying any time for payment of such money‑Appeal having been dismissed for non prosecution, appellate Court having no occasion for making any such order‑Order passed for payment of purchase money at stage of execution application in trial Court but no period was specified for payment thereof‑Purchase money deposited after one month and 8 days of order made therefor‑Party not approaching any Court for obtaining time for making payment of purchase money in pursuance of directions of trial Court and payment actually made after more than three years‑‑Held, party had failed to deposit purchase money within "reasonable time" and last benefit of pre‑emption decree in his favour.‑Pre‑emption.
PLD 1959
Privy Council Appeal No. 10 of 1957, decided on 1st December, 1958 from the Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa.

P L D 1959 Privy Council 68

MOHAMED HAJI ABDULLAH and another‑Appellants Versus GHELA MANEK SHAH and others‑Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 1987
Appeals Nos. 407(R) of 1985 and 83 (L) of 1984 decided on 12th February,1984.

1987 P L C (C

ABDUL LATIF QURESHI Versus CHAIRMAN,WAPDA

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLD 1993
Civil Appeal No.65 of 1992, decided on 14th July, 1993.

P L D 1993 Azad J&K 168

MUHAMMAD BASHIR and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus ALMA BIBI and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
PTD 1992
Income-tax Reference No.3 of 1989, decided on 9th July, 1990.

1992 P T D 1051

ASHOK KUMAR JALAN Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: Bombay High Court (India)

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library