Carriers
Carriers legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Carriers Carrier-Damage to goods in transit (by contact with sea water)-Fresh survey report at consignee's instance, after a joint report at carrier's and consignee's instance had already been, made-Carrier not served with notice regarding second survey-' Second survey-report, held, not binding on carrier-Joint survey-report binding on parties.
Carriers -By Sea-Governed by Common Law of England. Carriers by sea are governed by the Common Law of England. Carriers by sea who offer to carry the goods of all commerce in a general ship or who run a line of ships from port to port habitually carrying all goods brought to them, are under the Common Law common carriers. and thus incur the same liability in respect of loss or damage to the goods carried by them subject to any express exceptions relieving them from such liability.
"Carriers", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22022
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Carriers"
P L D 1970 Supreme Court 67
THE RIVERS STEAM NAVIGATION Co. LTD. AND OTHERS‑ — Appellants Versus THE DISTRICT COUNCIL OF BAKARGANJ AND ANOTHER‑ — Respondents
Court:P L D 2004 Karachi 439
Dr. Pro. HAROON AHMED — Plaintiff Versus Messrs BRITISH AIRWAYS and 3 others — Defendants
Court: High Court2000 C L C 1892'
TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus INTER‑CONTINENTAL OCEANIC ENTERPRISES CORPORATION and 2 others‑‑‑Defendants .
Court: KarachiP L D 1974 Karachi 321
FAROOK OMAR — ‑Plaintiff Versus NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE Co. LTD., KARACHI,
Court:P L D 1947 Privy Council 55
Present: Lords Macmillan, Wright, Porter, Simonds and Uthwatt Versus Privy Council Appeal No, 44 of 1945, decided on 5th February 1947, from Canada.
Court:2003 P T D 2030
Messrs EHSAN-UD-DIN & COMPANY, LAHORE Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION/CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD and 4 others
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 1968 Karachi 252
CENTRAL INSURANCE Co. LTD.‑‑Plaintiff Versus (1) CHITTAGONG STEAMSHIP CORPORATION LID., AND 9
Court: (a) Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (XXVI of 1925), Art. III(6) Implied agreement between carrier and consignee to extend time for bringing suit and to compensate‑Consignee has a new cause of action from date of agreement‑Can bring suit either for specific performance of such agreement within 3 years or for compensation for breach of such agreement also within 3 years‑Abdul Jalil Chowdhury v. Muhammadi Steamship Co. P L D 1961 S C 340 ref. and Newzealand Insurance Co. v. United Oriental Steamship Co. P L D 1962 Kar.,151 considered.P L D 1958 Dacca 460
MESSRS. ABDUR RAHMAN ABDUL GANI‑Appellant Versus MESSRS. MACKINNON MACKENZIE & Co. of CHITTAGONG, and another‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1970 Dacca 445
EAGLE STAR INSURANCE Co. LTD., KARACHI Defendant‑ — Appellant Versus RAHMANIA TRADING COMPANY, CHITTAGONG — Plaintiff — Respondent
Court: