Minor Mineral Rules
Minor Mineral Rules legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Minor Mineral Rules Minor Mineral Rules, r. 3 (2)-Person proceeded against should be proved to have been found in possession of recently quarried mineral.
"Minor Mineral Rules", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22054
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Minor Mineral Rules"
P L D (Rev
MESSRS. RED PATH BROWN & Co.‑Petitioner Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1975 Lahore 954
ABDUR REHMAN SHAH‑Appellant Versus THE WEST PAKISTAN (PUNJAB) PROVINCE -Respondent
Court:P L D 1960 W
IMAM DIN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1948 Lahore 417
THE PUNJAB PROVINCE‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus POLA and others‑Plaintiffs‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D (Rev
THE CROWN (PUNJAB PROVINCE)‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS. GAMMAON (PAKISTAN) LTD., WAH CANTONMENT DISTRICT, ATTOCK — Respondent
Court: High Court1995 M L D 123
SHAUKAT ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND MINERAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2004 Supreme Court 659
MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHAN and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus COLLECTOR, MANSEHRA and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:P L D 2012 Lahore 83
WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and another — Petitioners Versus ASSISTANT DIRECTOR MINES AND MINERALS, ATTOCK and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2024 C L C 1731
WAHID KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus SECRETARY MINES AND MINERALS, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR and others — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 1986 Karachi 574
ALI MOHATARAM NAQVI‑Plaintiff Versus MESSRS COGEFAR‑ASTALDI SIDMAIL‑Defendant
Court: Ss. 62 & 69‑‑Sind Land Revenue Rules. R. 66‑Regulation of Mines and Oilfield and Mineral Development (Government Control) Act (XXIV of 1948), S 4‑ Pakistan Mining Concession Rules, 1960, R. 3‑Interpretation of statutes‑fires of Ss. 62 & 69 of Sind Land Revenue Code, and R. 66 of Sind Land Revenue Rules‑Although Ss. 62 & 69 of Land Revenue Code do not provide for grant of permit for removal of gravel stone aggregate, yet R. 66 of Sind Land Revenue Rules provide for removal of earth, sand, stones etc.‑Provisions of Act XXIV of 1948 and Pakistan Mining Concession Rules, 1960, would have effect "notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any enactment or in any instru ment having effect by virtue of an enactment other than Act of 1948"‑Powers under R. 66 of Sind Rules though very wide, held, must be understood it relation to notwithstanding clause of Act of 1948‑Rule 66 does not lay down any condition whereas Pakistan Mining Concession Rules prescribe certain conditions as to maximum area of lend, maximum quantity of stone, fee to be levied and royalty to be charged which being inconsistent with Ss. 62 & 69 of Sind Land Revenue Code and R. 66 made there under. would prevail ‑ A permit envisaging excavation involving sub‑surface work, would exclusively fall within ambit of Pakistan Mining Concession Rules and would be beyond purview of R. 66 of Sind Land Revenue Rules‑Interpretation of statutes.