Home Maxims & Terms Residential Site meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Residential Site

Residential Site legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

Definition not found in search database.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Residential Site", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22059

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Residential Site"

CLC 1990
R.O.R.No.1545 of 1987, decided on 20th May, 1990.

1990 C L C 1996

FATEH MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus AISHA BIBI and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Board of Revenue Punjab
MLD 1987
R.O.R. No.1547 of 1984, decided on 18th September, 1984.

1987 M L D 2873

ALLAH BAKHSH and 3 others — Petitioners Versus AMIR and another — Respondents

Court: Board of Revenue Punjab
CLC 2001
R.O.R. Nos.3715, 3716, 3717 and 3718 of 1995, decided on 3rd August, 2000.

2001 C L C 340

SHAFIQUE AHMAD and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Board of Revenue Punjab
CLC 2003
N/A

2003 C L C 1026

MUHAMMAD SADIQ and others — Petitioners Versus AHSAN MOHY-UD-DIN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1987
R .O.R . No.815, of 1985, decided on 9th July, 1985.

1987 M L D 1086

SHAUKAT ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Board of Revenue Punjab
PLD 1962
Revision No. 186 of 1960‑61, decided on 11th February 1962, District Bahawalnagar.

P L D 1962 W

HABIB‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD DIN‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 2010
extraneous consideration or on recommendations of persons having some authority or influence to wield---System would be spoiled if already not destroyed and stream of justice should be allowed to flow unpolluted by extra institutional influence---While passing order in favour of respondent, authorities had transgressed the limit of jurisdiction in behaving under the command of Army personnel---Order passed by authorities in favour of respondent was without lawful authority, of no legal effect and mala fide---Decision taken in favour of petitioner originally in auction proceedings would remain intact and petitioner was declared owner of land in question---Petition was allowed accordingly

2010 C L C 976

MUHAMMAD MANSHA — Petitioner Versus MEMBER/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2005
N/A

2005 Y L R 2075

Sh. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE — Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF PUNAJB through Collector, Jhang — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 1991
Writ Petition No.7932 of 1980, heard on 23rd December, 1990.

1991 C L C 1001

Mst. NASREEN ZOHRA ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director‑General

Court: Lahore
CLC 1994
Writ Petition No. 11088 of 1991, decided on 5th June, 1993.

1994CLC871

ANWAR‑UL‑HAQ and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER (COLONIES), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Court: Lahore