University of Karachi
University of Karachi legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Ordinances and Regulations, Ord. VII, Chapter X-Election to Senate-Vice-Chancellor must declare names of successful candidates after receipt of report of committee-Any disputes may then be referred to Chancellor-University of Karachi. Act (LIX of 1950), S. 39-Failure, of Vice-Chancellor to declare result of election following allegations of malpractices-Chancellor declaring election invalid-Chancellor's order illegal.
"University of Karachi", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22080
Precedents & Case Laws citing "University of Karachi"
1987 C L C 1487
NAEEM MIRZA‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND through SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, SIND SECRETARIAT and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2013 M L D 9
MUHAMMAD ZAHID MAQSOOD — Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI through Vice Chancellor and 4 others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 2004 Karachi 109
Syed JAMALUDDIN — Applicant/Accused Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: High Court1991 C L C 334
Hafiz Syed ALI ATHER‑‑‑Petitioner Versus VICE‑CHANCELLOR & EX‑OFFICIO CHAIRMAN OF SYNDICATE,
Court: KarachiP L D 1958 (W
S. M. SALEEM, — Petitioner Versus (1) THE VICE‑CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI, (2) THE CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY of Karachi‑Respondents Nos. 1 & 2.
Court:P L D 1956 (W
WARISALI KHAN KHATTAK‑Plaintiff Versus THE UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI‑Defendant
Court:2010 P L C (C
IRFAN MAJEED Versus UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI through Vice-Chancellor/Registrar, University Campus,
Court: Karachi High CourtP L D 2011 Karachi 504
Prof. Dr. SURAYYA KHATOON, CHAIRPERSON UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI — Petitioner Versus CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI and 7 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2022 M L D 1892
ARIF HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI through Registrar and others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 1989 Karachi 343
HUMAYUN NIZAMI‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND through its Secretary, Health Department and 4 others‑‑Respondents
Court: