Home Maxims & Terms Accounts, Suit for meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Accounts, Suit for

Accounts, Suit for legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2005 YLR 2145 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Illegal and mala fide arrestAppreciation of evidencePlaintiff averred that he was arrested illegally with mala fide intention and he had suffered humiliationTrial Court decreed the suit for damagesAppellate Court reduced the amount of damages from Rs. 100 thousands to Rs.50 thousandsValidity

Defendant had pleaded that plaintiff was defaulter of property tax and warrants of his arrest were issued according to law and he was arrested in performance of public duty

Plaintiff had filed suit for declaration and injunction challenging the assessment and notice was issued in that case

Plaintiff had accompanied Process Server to effect service

Defendant took the summons and copy of the plaint and was annoyed and lost temper directed the Process Server to go to office and get, the service completed

Plaintiff was arrested in the office of defendant and on his orders warrants of arrest were prepared

Defendant had released the plaintiff on payment of tax amount

Provisions of West Pakistan 'Land Revenue Act, 1997, and also Immovable Property Tax Act were not complied with

Warrant did not contain any date

Findings recorded by Courts below were correct and in accord with evidence on record

Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.

1977 PLD 829 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Suit for-Principal and agent-Suit for accounts by an agent does not lie against his principal-Such suit, however, maintainable only if amount of commission due to agent not ascertainable.-[Principal and agent].

1976 PLD 623 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Agent, unlike his principal, has no statutory right to sue for accounts and must sue for a sum certain upon a balance due to him on account ? Agent however permitted in exceptional cases to sue principal for accounts, a g., where accounts maintained by principal rendering it impossible to bring suit for recovery of a sum certain?Plaintiffs themselves maintaining accounts of milling of wheat and all materials evidence with regard to alleged defective quality and quantity in their possession ? Plaintiffs even claiming specific amounts on account of quality allowance?No special circumstances, held, made out justifying making an exception to rule against non?maintainability of agent's suit for accounts against principal.

1975 PLD 598 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Decree for accounts-Could not be passed against party not shown to be an accounting party-Plaintiff has to prove relationship obliging defendant to give accounts.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Accounts, Suit for", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2211

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Accounts, Suit for"

PLD 1979
Revision Application No. 124 of 1973, decided on 17th April, 1979.

P L D 1979 Karachi 747

MESSRS BURMAH SHELL OIL STORAGE & DISTRIBUTING COMPANY LTD., KARACHI-Applicants Versus ABDUR RASHID AND 2 OTHERS -Respondents

Court: -- S. 115-Rendition of accounts, suit for-Fact of defendant sole licensee of premises within knowledge of plaintiff-Plaintiff assured by defendent for getting his name inserted as partner but not done so-- Company also never accepting plaintiff as partner-Coming of plaintiff on disputed premises in such circumstances, held, was without any right and Company not liable for rendering him any account-Order set aside in circumstances of case.-Revision (civil).
MLD 1985
Regular Second Appeal No. 11 of 1973, heard on 10th March, 1984.

1985 M L D 1537

SADAR DIN — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2006
N/A

2006 C L D 167

Mehr ASHIQ HUSSAIN — Appellant Versus CITIBANK, N.A. through Chief Manager and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1988
Suit No. 507 of 1983, decided on 15th December, 1987.

1988 M L D 274

GULZAR HUSSAIN AWAN‑‑Plaintiff Versus AKBAR‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1977
First Appeal No. 41 of 1967, decided on 27th May 1977.

P L D 1977 Karachi 829

THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SANGHAR AND 2 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus HABIBULLAH‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑ Suit for‑Principal and agent‑Suit for accounts by an agent does not lie against his principal‑Such suit, however, maintainable only if amount of commission due to agent not ascertainable.‑Principal and agent.
CLC 1987
Suit No. 725 of 1979, decided on 13th June, 1987.

1987 C L C 2114

AFZAL KHAN and 6 others‑ ‑Plaintiffs Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED‑‑Defendant

Court: Karachi
CLC 1980
First Appeal from Original Order No. 199 of 1977, heard on 15th December, 1979.

1980 C L C 1283

ABDUL KARIM — Appellant/Plaintiff Versus IQBAL-UR-REHMAN AND 5 OTHERS — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1969
F.A.O. No. 18 of 196'x, decided on 18th April 1969.

P L D 1969 Peshawar 175

Appellant Versus Qazi MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court:
CLD 2013
2012-December-17

2013 C L D 630

Syed TAHIR HUSSAIN SHAH — Appellant Versus Syed SAEED ANWAR and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2013
N/A

2013 M L D 1154

Syed TAHIR HUSSAIN SHAH — Appellant Versus Syed SAEED ANWAR and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore