Accounts, Suit for
Accounts, Suit for legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Defendant had pleaded that plaintiff was defaulter of property tax and warrants of his arrest were issued according to law and he was arrested in performance of public duty
Plaintiff had filed suit for declaration and injunction challenging the assessment and notice was issued in that case
Plaintiff had accompanied Process Server to effect service
Defendant took the summons and copy of the plaint and was annoyed and lost temper directed the Process Server to go to office and get, the service completed
Plaintiff was arrested in the office of defendant and on his orders warrants of arrest were prepared
Defendant had released the plaintiff on payment of tax amount
Provisions of West Pakistan 'Land Revenue Act, 1997, and also Immovable Property Tax Act were not complied with
Warrant did not contain any date
Findings recorded by Courts below were correct and in accord with evidence on record
Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
Suit for-Principal and agent-Suit for accounts by an agent does not lie against his principal-Such suit, however, maintainable only if amount of commission due to agent not ascertainable.-[Principal and agent].
Agent, unlike his principal, has no statutory right to sue for accounts and must sue for a sum certain upon a balance due to him on account ? Agent however permitted in exceptional cases to sue principal for accounts, a g., where accounts maintained by principal rendering it impossible to bring suit for recovery of a sum certain?Plaintiffs themselves maintaining accounts of milling of wheat and all materials evidence with regard to alleged defective quality and quantity in their possession ? Plaintiffs even claiming specific amounts on account of quality allowance?No special circumstances, held, made out justifying making an exception to rule against non?maintainability of agent's suit for accounts against principal.
Decree for accounts-Could not be passed against party not shown to be an accounting party-Plaintiff has to prove relationship obliging defendant to give accounts.
"Accounts, Suit for", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2211
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Accounts, Suit for"
P L D 1979 Karachi 747
MESSRS BURMAH SHELL OIL STORAGE & DISTRIBUTING COMPANY LTD., KARACHI-Applicants Versus ABDUR RASHID AND 2 OTHERS -Respondents
Court: -- S. 115-Rendition of accounts, suit for-Fact of defendant sole licensee of premises within knowledge of plaintiff-Plaintiff assured by defendent for getting his name inserted as partner but not done so-- Company also never accepting plaintiff as partner-Coming of plaintiff on disputed premises in such circumstances, held, was without any right and Company not liable for rendering him any account-Order set aside in circumstances of case.-Revision (civil).1985 M L D 1537
SADAR DIN — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2006 C L D 167
Mehr ASHIQ HUSSAIN — Appellant Versus CITIBANK, N.A. through Chief Manager and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore1988 M L D 274
GULZAR HUSSAIN AWAN‑‑Plaintiff Versus AKBAR‑‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1977 Karachi 829
THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SANGHAR AND 2 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus HABIBULLAH‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ Suit for‑Principal and agent‑Suit for accounts by an agent does not lie against his principal‑Such suit, however, maintainable only if amount of commission due to agent not ascertainable.‑Principal and agent.1987 C L C 2114
AFZAL KHAN and 6 others‑ ‑Plaintiffs Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED‑‑Defendant
Court: Karachi1980 C L C 1283
ABDUL KARIM — Appellant/Plaintiff Versus IQBAL-UR-REHMAN AND 5 OTHERS — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1969 Peshawar 175
Appellant Versus Qazi MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:2013 C L D 630
Syed TAHIR HUSSAIN SHAH — Appellant Versus Syed SAEED ANWAR and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2013 M L D 1154
Syed TAHIR HUSSAIN SHAH — Appellant Versus Syed SAEED ANWAR and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore