Tawan
Tawan legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Entitled to great respect-Irrigation file silent on the point as to how much area was to be irrigated in normal way and extent of undue benefit-Penalty reduced.
Total irrigation up-to-date less than authorised irrigation -Penalty reduced to twice crop rates.
Penalty imposed equivalent to six times crop rates, held justified.
Reasonable way of assigning responsibility should be adopted.
Tawan Unauthorised irrigation by person ignorant of procedure of Canal Department and refugee from the place where there was no canal irrigation-Penalty remitted.
Whether each individual can demand his right of appeal from the date on which he is individually served.
Irrigators misbehaving for first time=Penalty imposed, reduced to four times crop rates.
Tawan Deliberate interference with outlets-Heavy tawans justified.
"Tawan", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22116
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Tawan"
1994 C L C 2108
GHULAM JIIANI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Board of Revenue Punjab1991 C L C 1423
GHULAM NABI and others ‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Member Board of Revenue and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1988 C L C 1870
MUHAMMAD YAHYA KHAN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MAZHAR HUSSAIN and others‑ ‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1959 W
JAMAL‑UD‑DIN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:1984 M L D 381
ARIF ALI and others — Petitioners Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, FAISALABAD and others — Respondents
Court: LahorePLD 1990 Supreme Court 736
MUHAMMAD IOBAL and 6 others — Appellants Versus SHAMS-UD-DIN and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2008 Y L R 2442
GHULAM BARI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: Lahore1988 P Cr
NAVEED AHMAD — Petitioner Versus MAJEEDAN BIBI and another — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D
THE STATE‑ — Petitioner Versus SULTAN ALI‑ — Respondent
Court:1992 C L C 1585
Mst. HAMEEDA BIBI and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore