Mosque
Mosque legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Mosques are for Allah and not for a particular group, party, sect (mazhab) or sub-sect (maslaq).
Principles of Shariah governing mosques.
Proceedings under S. 145, Cr.P.C. could not be initiated against a Mosque.
Mosque Mosque-Imam incurring displeasure of residents and congregations by his wayward habits and undesirable behaviour-May be removed and be replaced by another.
Whether ceremony, Khatam Sharif Ghausia Alia, in consonance with injunctions of Islam and whether such function could be held within precincts of mosque (Quaere).
Mosque Possession-Registered body managing affairs of mosque-Expenditure on mosque by individuals-Control and management not transferred to such individuals.
Mosque- Waqf-Purpose defined.
Whether place not properly dedicated can attain sanctity of, merely because it is used as such: (Quaere).
"Mosque", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22129
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Mosque"
1999 Y L R 2344
Raja ABDUL QAYYUM and 9 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus CHAIRMAN, M.D.A., MIRPUR and 22 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Shariat Court (A J & K)1997 M L D 299
HAQ NAWAZ and others — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary Civil Secretariat; Lahore and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2006 M L D 938
ATTAULLAH KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus Haji ABDUL WAHID and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2019 C L C 678
Rana MEHMOOD ALI AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, E.G.M.I. and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1957 S
MOHAMMAD SHAH‑Appellant Versus FASIH‑UD‑DIN ANSARI and others‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2014 Balochistan 132
NOOR UDDIN KHAN TAREEN — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1968 P Cr
ABDUL MAJID‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1960 (W
RANGAL SHAH AND OTHERS‑Defendants‑Appellants Versus MULA JADAL‑Plaintiff‑Respondent
Court: (a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 100‑Questions of fact‑Cannot be re‑opened in second appeal : Nadir Shah v. Lal Shah and Amir Husain Shah P L D 1954 Lah. 447 and Abdul Majid and others v. Khalil Ahmad P L D 1955 F C 38 ref.P L D 1968 Lahore 315
(5) Maulvi BARKAT ALI‑Appellants Versus (1) KHURSHID ANWAR,
Court:P L D 2008 Lahore 428
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM MUGHAL — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Local Government Punjab, Lahore
Court: High Court