Home Maxims & Terms Spes Successionis meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Spes Successionis

Spes Successionis legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1960 PLD 764 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Spes Successionis

Agreement re: transfer of-Transferor later coming into ownership-Transferee may sue to have transfer effected-Suit for declaration that transferee is owner, not proper form of suit-Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S. 6.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Spes Successionis", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22152

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Spes Successionis"

SCMR 1979
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 155‑P of 1979, decided on, 3rd July, 1979.

1979 S C M R 619

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑Petitioner Versus SHAH PASAND KHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: ‑ S. 42 read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIX, rrr. 1 & 2‑Declaration‑Injunction, temporary‑Muhammadan Law Does not reognise spes successionis‑Presumptive heir‑Has no right at all in property of his ancestor‑Petitioner having no vested right in praesenti in property belonging to his living grandfather, held, cannot be allowed to restrain his grandfather from disposing of his property in any manner.‑Injunction‑Muhammadan Law.
SCMR 1987
Civil Appeal No.241 of 1976, decided on 31st March, 1987.

1987 S C M R 1029

ABDUL KHALIQ through Legal Heirs‑‑Appellant Versus BASHIR AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑S.6 (a)‑‑Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (IX of 1962), Preamble‑‑West Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (IX of1948), S. 3‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3)‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider contentions (i) that as the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 did not apply to Province of Punjab, the transfer or surrender of reversionary rights were valid under custom; (ii) that if the provisions of Act V of 1962 are read alongwith those of Act, 1948, the position that emerges was that a limited estate, held, by Muslim female under custom having been terminated, widow and two daughters of deceased owner became vested with the ownership of property according to the share under Shariat Law and therefore, the relinquishment of their interests in favour of the appellant was valid.‑‑ Custom(Punjab).
CLC 1989
Civil Revision No.1194‑D and Civil Miscellaneous No. 3081 of 1989, decided on 1st

1989 C L C 2140

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD KHAN and 5 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1991
Civil Petition No.856 of 1989, decided on 29th October, 1989.

1991 S C M R 1210

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD KHAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2001
Civil Suit No. 1503 of 2000, decided on 21st December, 2000.

2001 Y L R 3153

Khawaja TAUQEER AHMED — Plaintiff Versus Khawaja BASHIR AHMED and 4 others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLC 1986
Civil Appeal No. 20 of 1985, decided on 24th May, 1986.

1986 C L C 2923

ZEENAT BEGUM and another — Appellants Versus JAN MIR KHAN and 8 others — Respondents

Court: Quetta
PLD 2014
2013-December-18

P L D 2014 Supreme Court 331

ABRAR AHMED and another — Appellants Versus IRSHAD AHMED — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1951
Regular Second Appeal No. 1,12 of 1948, decided on 3rd January, 1951, from the decree of Sheikh Bashir Ahmad, District Judge, Mianwali, dated the 9th of February, 1948. This case was referred to the Division Bench by Hon'ble the Chief Justice on 1st July, 1949.

P

MUHAMMAD SHER‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus Mst. GHULAM FATIMA and others‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1955
18th November 1954

FEDERAL COURT

Plaintiff‑Appellant Versus Sayyed FATEH MUHAMMAD SHAH

Court: High Court
CLC 1987
Civil Revision No.1446 of 1986, decided on 17th November,1986.

1987 C L C 513

Before Abaid Ullah Khan, J Versus HAKAM KHAN and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore