Home Maxims & Terms Reconstruction of Record meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Reconstruction of Record

Reconstruction of Record legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2008 PCrLJ 1084 SHARIAT-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Ss. 302, 324, 337, 147, 148 & 149Appreciation of evidenceReconstruction of record

When case was at the stage of final arguments, record pertaining to whole case was 'destroyed due to disaster of earthquake

Trial Court started reconstruction of record after summoning opposite party

Verified copies of the record along with available record was presented for reconstruction of the same

Counsel for petitioners/accused sought adjournment for producing the record in their possession, but despite granting them three adjournments, they failed to produce the same

Permission from Shariat Court was also obtained for reconstruction of record

Petitioners/accused's objection was that record collected and made part of reconstruction being the photocopies, same was not admissible in evidence; and that reconstruction of the record could be initiated from the date of permission of Shariat Court

No objection was ever raised by petitioners/accused with regard to photocopies before the Trial Court

Participation of the petitioners/accused in the whole proceedings before the Trial Court would bar them to raise such objection at later stage

Objection of petitioners was repelled

Petitioners, were free to produce concerned documents, if any, in their possession

Petitioners having participated in the proceedings of the case, could not back out from their participation and claim to restart proceedings afresh.

1960 PLD 1010 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Reconstruction of Record -Duty of Court-Reconstruction of lost record on party's application.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Reconstruction of Record", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22155

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Reconstruction of Record"

PCRLJ 2008
2008-April-7

2008 P Cr

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Shariat Court (AJ&K)
CLC 1996
Civil Appeal No.57 of 1995, decided on 16th March, 1996.

1996 C L C 1545

Mst. ZANIB JAN and 4 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. ZUBAIDA BEGUM and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents' ,

Court: (Supreme Court Azad J&K)
CLC 1995
Civil Appeals Nos. 41 and 42 of 1994, decided on 3rd May, 1995.

1995 C L C 1643

Mst. GUL BEGUM and 17 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. REHMAT JAN and 8 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Azad J&K
CLC 2014
2013-May-8

2014 C L C 1148

CHAIRMAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MUZAFFARABAD — Petitioner Versus KHAMDO BIBI and 27 others — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
PLD 1987
Civil Revision Application No. 232 of 1985, decided on 12th November, 1986.

P L D 1987 Karachi 51

Before Mamoon Kazi, J Versus ALI AHMAD‑Opponent

Court:
MLD 1989
Writ Petition No. 1618, decided on 29th March, 1982.

1989 M L D 3485

SUFAID KHAN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (CONSOLIDATION) and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLRN 2021
Criminal Accountability Appeal No.39 and Constitution Petition No. D-7380 of 2018, decided on 1st September, 2020.

2021 Y L R Note 80

KARAMUDDIN PANHYAR — Appellant Versus The STATE through National Accountability Bureau — Respondent

Court: Sindh
CLC 2008
2007-August-6

2008 C L C 131

MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHAN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AZIZ KHAN and another — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
PLD 1960
Letters Patent Appeal No. 26 of 1960, decided on 20th June 1960.

P L D 1960 (W

Sh. MAHBOOB ALAM‑Appellant Versus THE CENTRAL EXCHANGE BANK, LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION)‑Respondent

Court:
YLR 1999
Civil Appeal No. 163 of 1998, decided on 21st December, 1998.

1999 Y L R 147

Raja MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN‑‑Appellant Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, AJ&K and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)