Copy
Copy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Copy -Certified copy of order of allotment not containing words "with four or five other families" whereas the original order was "to I and H with four or five other families"-No allegation of forgery-Mistake treated as one of copyist.
"Copy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22164
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Copy"
P L D 2006 Lahore 731
MIQDAD HUSSAIN — Appellant Versus JUDGE GUARDIAN COURT NO.1 and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2017 Y L R Note 126
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)1980 C L C 1972
PENINSULAR & ORIENTAL STEAM NEVIGATION Co.-Appellant Versus PFIZER LABORATORIES LTD., KARACHI AND
Court: KarachiP L D 1999 Lahore 231
Mst. KALSOOM BEGUM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus AHMAD RAZA BUKHARI‑‑‑Respondent
Court:1984 C L C 1208
BUDHA (DECEASED) AND 4 OTHERS‑ Petitioners Versus ALI BAKHSH AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1978 Lahore 1027
THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX & INCOME-TAX, RAWALPINDI ZONE, RAWALPINDI-Petitioner Versus MESSRS PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LTD. RAWALPINDI- Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1976 Lahore 802
MUHAMMAD DIN‑Appellant Versus Ch. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ S. 12‑Limitation‑Exclusion of time required for obtaining certified copy‑Copy not ready on date given by Copying Agency‑Time from date of application till time of its preparation will be time "requisite" for obtaining such copy‑Such time to be excluded under S. 12, Limi tation Act‑Copy prepared on 14‑6‑71 but date given for its delivery being 15‑6‑71‑Appellant obtaining copy on 30‑6‑71 but filing appeal on 22‑7‑71‑Period spent by appellant from 30‑6‑71 to 22‑7‑71 Held, cannot be considered to be time requisite for obtaining certified copy.‑Limitation.PLD 1991 Supreme Court 400
CANTONMENT BOARD, KHARIAN CANTT. through Executive Officer ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHAM ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 2008 Supreme Court 577
Mian MUHAMMAD SABIR — Appellant Versus Malik MUHAMMAD SADIQ through Legal Heirs and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1979 C L C 694
THE MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE SIALKOT Appellant, Versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: Lahore